International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
Comparative between eravacycline and best available therapy in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii HAP/VAP in China: a retrospective real-world multicenter cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Huangdu, Luo Yifeng, Song Meijun, Zhang Xiaoju, He Min, Liu Xiangyan, Pan Chun, Pan Lingai, Li Xiaojing, Wan Xianyao, Chen Kun, Cui Wei, Zhou Shiting, Zou Shutao, He Jintao, Liu Haiyang, Hua Xiaoting, Du Xiaoxing, Li Xi, Zeng Zhenguo, Yu Yunsong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a major cause of hospital- and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) with limited treatment options. Eravacycline (ERA) shows potent in vitro activity and favorable pulmonary pharmacokinetics, but clinical evidence for CRAB HAP/VAP remains scarce. We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ERA.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study at 12 hospitals in China (April 2022-March 2024). Adults with microbiologically confirmed CRAB HAP/VAP treated with ERA or best available therapy (BAT) for ≥ 4 days were propensity scores matched. Primary outcomes were clinical success at end of treatment (EOT) and 28-day mortality.
RESULTS: After 3349 patients screened, 382 were included (ERA 204; BAT 178). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Clinical success at EOT was higher with ERA than BAT (63.2% vs 55.1%), while 28-day mortality was similar (40.1% vs 42.0%). ERA achieved higher microbiological eradication at EOT (45.1% vs 32.0%) and day 14 (36.8% vs 22.5%). Adverse events occurred less frequently with ERA. In targeted first-line treatment, ERA showed higher clinical success, greater microbiological eradication and faster clinical response without increased mortality.
CONCLUSION: Eravacycline improved microbiological clearance, clinical response, and safety compared with BAT for CRAB HAP/VAP, particularly when used as targeted first-line therapy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study at 12 hospitals in China (April 2022-March 2024). Adults with microbiologically confirmed CRAB HAP/VAP treated with ERA or best available therapy (BAT) for ≥ 4 days were propensity scores matched. Primary outcomes were clinical success at end of treatment (EOT) and 28-day mortality.
RESULTS: After 3349 patients screened, 382 were included (ERA 204; BAT 178). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Clinical success at EOT was higher with ERA than BAT (63.2% vs 55.1%), while 28-day mortality was similar (40.1% vs 42.0%). ERA achieved higher microbiological eradication at EOT (45.1% vs 32.0%) and day 14 (36.8% vs 22.5%). Adverse events occurred less frequently with ERA. In targeted first-line treatment, ERA showed higher clinical success, greater microbiological eradication and faster clinical response without increased mortality.
CONCLUSION: Eravacycline improved microbiological clearance, clinical response, and safety compared with BAT for CRAB HAP/VAP, particularly when used as targeted first-line therapy.