Current problems in diagnostic radiology · 2024
Diagnostic value of cardiothoracic ratio in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: comparison to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anjuna Reghunath, Paulius Simkus, Manuel Gutierrez Gimeno, Audra Banisauskaite, Jurate Noreikaite, Monika Radike
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) as a simple method to assess the cardiac size and function in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
METHODS: In a sample of 91 patients (66 patients with diagnosed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and 25 controls) we calculated the CTR on a posteroanterior chest radiograph and ventricular and atrial size based on accepted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging values. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction was also calculated. The CTR and cardiac chamber size were compared between patients with NICM and healthy individuals. The distinction between normal and increased cardiac chamber size was made using published normal CMR reference values stratified by age and gender.
RESULTS: CTR values were higher in the NICM group (50.7±5.5 % Vs. 45.3±4.7 %, p<0.001). Likewise, LVEDVi, LV indexed mass, LA indexed volume, LA indexed area, and RA indexed area were higher, and LVEF and RVEF were lower in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.05). In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, the greatest correlation between CTR and CMR values was with LVEDVi (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001), LA indexed volume (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001), LA indexed area (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001) and RA indexed area (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001). However, the correlation strength was only moderate.
CONCLUSION: Despite patients with NICM had higher CTR values than the control group, a substantial proportion of these patients showed normal CTRs (<50 %). This fact limits the usefulness of CTR to reliably predict NICM. Correlation between CTR and heart chamber dilation on CMR was only weak to moderate.
METHODS: In a sample of 91 patients (66 patients with diagnosed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and 25 controls) we calculated the CTR on a posteroanterior chest radiograph and ventricular and atrial size based on accepted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging values. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction was also calculated. The CTR and cardiac chamber size were compared between patients with NICM and healthy individuals. The distinction between normal and increased cardiac chamber size was made using published normal CMR reference values stratified by age and gender.
RESULTS: CTR values were higher in the NICM group (50.7±5.5 % Vs. 45.3±4.7 %, p<0.001). Likewise, LVEDVi, LV indexed mass, LA indexed volume, LA indexed area, and RA indexed area were higher, and LVEF and RVEF were lower in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.05). In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, the greatest correlation between CTR and CMR values was with LVEDVi (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001), LA indexed volume (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001), LA indexed area (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001) and RA indexed area (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001). However, the correlation strength was only moderate.
CONCLUSION: Despite patients with NICM had higher CTR values than the control group, a substantial proportion of these patients showed normal CTRs (<50 %). This fact limits the usefulness of CTR to reliably predict NICM. Correlation between CTR and heart chamber dilation on CMR was only weak to moderate.