MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0356356

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2026

How legal awareness shapes developers' data compliance behavior: A deterrence theory perspective.

Wang Xinyuan, Zhang Zhenyang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

As China's digital regulatory framework continues to evolve, understanding what drives software developers' data compliance behavior becomes increasingly important. Drawing on deterrence theory from a behavioral, law-in-action perspective, this study examines how data legal awareness influences data compliance behavior through perceived sanction certainty and perceived sanction severity, and how perceived compliance culture moderates these mediating pathways. Survey data collected from software developers were analyzed using structural equation modelling. The results indicate that data legal awareness promotes data compliance behavior directly and indirectly through perceived sanction certainty and perceived sanction severity, with certainty exerting a stronger mediating effect than severity. Perceived compliance culture significantly strengthens the effect of data legal awareness on perceived sanction certainty, while its moderating effect on perceived sanction severity receives only limited support. Theoretically, these findings extend deterrence theory to the data compliance domain by specifying the cognition-perception-behavior pathway and identifying the moderating role of compliance culture. Practically, the findings offer implications for how regulatory authorities allocate enforcement resources and how organizations design compliance management systems.

Для цитирования: Wang Xinyuan, Zhang Zhenyang. How legal awareness shapes developers' data compliance behavior: A deterrence theory perspective.. PloS one. 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356356.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.