Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2026
The Value of Public Inquiries, Ethical Accountability, and Patient Voices: Reflections on the Infected Blood Inquiry.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gorman Richard, Smith Clive, Farsides Bobbie, Cave Emma
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This article contributes to the continuing conversation in Haemophilia about the UK Infected Blood Inquiry (IBI). Discussion within the journal to date has largely foregrounded professional and technical perspectives.
AIM: This article aims to bring back into view two elements central to the Inquiry-patient voice and the roles of law and ethics-and consider what this means for how the lessons of the IBI are interpreted in clinical and public discourse.
METHODS: The article engages with published reflections and commentary to consider how responsibility has been framed, how consent has been understood, and what is at stake in the shaping of professional memory.
RESULTS: The article shows how narrowed framings of consent, appeals to clinical authority, and selective uses of language risk marginalising those infected and affected. It argues that such narratives continue to shape how responsibility is allocated and how the Inquiry will be remembered within professional discourse.
CONCLUSION: Accountability, transparency, and recognition must remain central as the implications of the Inquiry continue to unfold, and as processes of reconciliation begin.
AIM: This article aims to bring back into view two elements central to the Inquiry-patient voice and the roles of law and ethics-and consider what this means for how the lessons of the IBI are interpreted in clinical and public discourse.
METHODS: The article engages with published reflections and commentary to consider how responsibility has been framed, how consent has been understood, and what is at stake in the shaping of professional memory.
RESULTS: The article shows how narrowed framings of consent, appeals to clinical authority, and selective uses of language risk marginalising those infected and affected. It argues that such narratives continue to shape how responsibility is allocated and how the Inquiry will be remembered within professional discourse.
CONCLUSION: Accountability, transparency, and recognition must remain central as the implications of the Inquiry continue to unfold, and as processes of reconciliation begin.