Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2023
Management of Guillain-Barré syndrome in Bangladesh: Clinical practice, limitations and recommendations for low- and middle-income countries.
Клинический случайПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Papri Nowshin, Islam Zhahirul, Ara Gulshan, Saha Tamal, Leonhard Sonja E, Endtz Hubert P, Jacobs Bart C, Mohammad Quazi D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Considerable variation in clinical practice for management of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has been observed worldwide. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) due to lack of facilities and treatment availability. We aimed to evaluate current clinical practice and limitations and to provide recommendation for GBS management in low-resource settings.
METHODS: We conducted an explanatory-sequential mixed-methods survey among neurologists and internists working in tertiary and secondary government hospitals in Bangladesh. There were two phases: (1) quantitative (cross-sectional survey to evaluate clinical practice and limitations); (2) qualitative (key informant interview to explain certain clinical practice and provide recommendations for GBS management in LMIC). Data were analyzed by frequencies, χ2 test and thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Among 159 physicians (65 neurologists and 94 internists), 11% and 8% physicians used Brighton and NINDS criteria respectively to diagnose GBS. Specific treatment protocols of GBS were used by 12% physicians. Overcrowding of patients, inadequate diagnostic facilities, high costs of standard therapy, and inadequate logistics and trained personnel for intensive care unit and rehabilitation services were considered major challenges for GBS management. In qualitative part, respondents recommended regular training for the physicians, development of cost-effective treatment strategies and appropriate patients' referral and management guideline considering existing limitations in health service delivery and socio-economic status of the country.
INTERPRETATION: Current study design and recommendations might be applied for other LMIC. Such data can assist policymakers to identify areas requiring urgent attention and take required action to improve GBS management in LMIC.
METHODS: We conducted an explanatory-sequential mixed-methods survey among neurologists and internists working in tertiary and secondary government hospitals in Bangladesh. There were two phases: (1) quantitative (cross-sectional survey to evaluate clinical practice and limitations); (2) qualitative (key informant interview to explain certain clinical practice and provide recommendations for GBS management in LMIC). Data were analyzed by frequencies, χ2 test and thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Among 159 physicians (65 neurologists and 94 internists), 11% and 8% physicians used Brighton and NINDS criteria respectively to diagnose GBS. Specific treatment protocols of GBS were used by 12% physicians. Overcrowding of patients, inadequate diagnostic facilities, high costs of standard therapy, and inadequate logistics and trained personnel for intensive care unit and rehabilitation services were considered major challenges for GBS management. In qualitative part, respondents recommended regular training for the physicians, development of cost-effective treatment strategies and appropriate patients' referral and management guideline considering existing limitations in health service delivery and socio-economic status of the country.
INTERPRETATION: Current study design and recommendations might be applied for other LMIC. Such data can assist policymakers to identify areas requiring urgent attention and take required action to improve GBS management in LMIC.