Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2024
Uveal Effusion Syndrome Due to WNT10A Mutation.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patnaik Gazal, Jagadeesh Sujatha, Bhende Muna, Biswas Jyotirmay
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Uveal effusion syndrome (UES) is an exudative detachment of ciliary body, retina and choroid. Various underlying causes leads to UES-like drugs (topiramate), inflammation and hypotony. Wnt gene involvement has never been associated with UES. We report a case of bilateral UES being misdiagnosed as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH), with Wnt gene dysfunction as the underlying trigger.
OBSERVATIONS: A 32-year-old male presented with diminution of vision in his left eye. He was found to have choroidal detachment with retinal detachment in his left eye. Choroidal detachment was noted in the right eye. Various ocular imaging including fundus fluorescein angiography and ocular coherence tomography was done. He was misdiagnosed as a case of VKH syndrome, for which he was treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy. However, a subclinical response was made to revisit the diagnosis. Ultrasound biomicroscopy showed supraciliary effusion. Systemic and genetic evaluation led to the detection of Wnt10A pathway mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: UES is an entity of diagnostic challenge. Careful and thorough systemic evaluation is required to clinch the diagnosis. We reported the first case of bilateral UES recalcitrant to corticosteroids, with Wnt10A gene mutation.
OBSERVATIONS: A 32-year-old male presented with diminution of vision in his left eye. He was found to have choroidal detachment with retinal detachment in his left eye. Choroidal detachment was noted in the right eye. Various ocular imaging including fundus fluorescein angiography and ocular coherence tomography was done. He was misdiagnosed as a case of VKH syndrome, for which he was treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy. However, a subclinical response was made to revisit the diagnosis. Ultrasound biomicroscopy showed supraciliary effusion. Systemic and genetic evaluation led to the detection of Wnt10A pathway mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: UES is an entity of diagnostic challenge. Careful and thorough systemic evaluation is required to clinch the diagnosis. We reported the first case of bilateral UES recalcitrant to corticosteroids, with Wnt10A gene mutation.