MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.021

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid nucleic acid tests for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dubois Constance, Smeesters Pierre R, Refes Yacine, Levy Corinne, Bidet Philippe, Cohen Robert, Chalumeau Martin, Toubiana Julie, Cohen Jérémie F

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acute pharyngitis is one of the most common conditions in outpatient settings and an important source of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) offer diagnosis of group A streptococcus at the point of care but have limited sensitivity. Rapid nucleic acid tests (RNATs) are now available; a systematic review of their accuracy is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of RNATs in patients with pharyngitis; to explore test-level and study-level factors that could explain variability in accuracy; and to compare the accuracy of RNATs with that of RADTs.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (1990-2020).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cross-sectional studies and randomized trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with pharyngitis.

INDEX TEST/S AND REFERENCE STANDARDS: RNAT commercial kits compared with throat culture.

METHODS

We assessed risk of bias and applicability using QUADAS-2. We performed meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity using the bivariate random-effects model. Variability was explored by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 38 studies (46 test evaluations; 17 411 test results). RNATs were most often performed in a laboratory. The overall methodological quality of primary studies was uncertain because of incomplete reporting. RNATs had a summary sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI 96.2%-98.3%) and a summary specificity of 95.1% (95% CI 93.6%-96.3%). There was low variability in estimates across studies. Variability in sensitivity and specificity was partially explained by test type (p < 0.05 for both). Sensitivity analyses limited to studies with low risk of bias showed robust accuracy estimates. RNATs were more sensitive than RADTs (13 studies; 96.8% versus 82.3%, p 0.004); there was no difference in specificity (p 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The high diagnostic accuracy of RNATs may allow their use as stand-alone tests to diagnose group A streptococcus pharyngitis. Based on direct comparisons, RNATs have greater sensitivity than RADTs and equal specificity. Further studies should evaluate RNATs in point-of-care settings.

Для цитирования: Dubois Constance, Smeesters Pierre R, Refes Yacine, Levy Corinne, Bidet Philippe, Cohen Robert, Chalumeau Martin, Toubiana Julie, Cohen Jérémie F. Diagnostic accuracy of rapid nucleic acid tests for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.