The American journal of cardiology · 2026
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Optimal Medical Therapy for Woven Coronary Anomaly (The Multicenter EVOLUTE-WOVEN Study).
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Güner Ahmet, Alizade Elnur, Tanık Veysel Ozan, Püşüroğlu Hamdi, Karaüzüm Kurtuluş, Varım Perihan, Çizgici Ahmet Yaşar, Kümet Ömer, Akyüz Ali Rıza, Arslan Enes, Serin Ebru, Deniz Muhammed Furkan, Hakgor Aykun, Suna Mehmet, Aktürk İbrahim Faruk, Uzun Fatih, Other Members of the EVOLUTE-WOVEN Study Investigators
Аннотация
Woven coronary artery anomaly (WCAA) is a rare congenital anomaly in which a coronary artery is divided into thin channels. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with WCAA under mid-term follow-up. From 2011 to 2025, patients who underwent PCI or received GDMT for WCAA were retrospectively collected. The primary outcome measurement was defined as a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and was the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, or rehospitalization for angina pectoris. The secondary endpoint was defined as the combination of death or target-vessel MI during follow-up. Sixty-one consecutive WCAA patients [male:52 (85%), mean age:56.27 ± 9.89 years] were included in this multicenter (n = 12) study. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: PCI (n = 30) and GDMT (n = 31). The most commonly used guidewires for successful wiring were Fielder XT-R and Gladius MG. The MACE (19% vs 3.3%, p = 0.104), death or MI (13% vs 3.3%, p = 0.354), and rehospitalization for angina (19% vs 3.3%, p = 0.104) rates were numerically higher in the GDMT group than in the PCI group. Inverse probability weighted-Cox regression analysis showed that the MACE (unadjusted HR 0.091, p = 0.028) was significantly different, while death or MI (unadjusted HR 0.160, p = 0.101) did not differ between the 2 groups. In conclusion, current data suggest that PCI may be associated with a lower risk of MACE, mainly driven by rehospitalization for angina pectoris, and comparable death or MI to GDMT; however, a strong inference cannot be made due to the retrospective observational design.