Cirugia y cirujanos · 2026
Minimally invasive approaches in ectopic pregnancy surgery: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kulhan Nur G, Bilgi Ahmet, Celik Cetin, Avci Fazil, Kulhan Mehmet
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) and conventional laparoscopy in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted, including 40 patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy, treated either with V-NOTES (n = 20) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 20). Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain scores, length of hospital stay, and complication rates.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and complication rates. However, V-NOTES resulted in significantly lower post-operative pain scores (Visual Analog Scale: 2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1; p = 0.01) and reduced opioid usage compared to conventional laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: V-NOTES appears to be a non-inferior alternative to conventional laparoscopy in ectopic pregnancy surgery, with comparable surgical safety and enhanced post-operative comfort. Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to confirm these findings.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted, including 40 patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy, treated either with V-NOTES (n = 20) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 20). Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain scores, length of hospital stay, and complication rates.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and complication rates. However, V-NOTES resulted in significantly lower post-operative pain scores (Visual Analog Scale: 2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1; p = 0.01) and reduced opioid usage compared to conventional laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: V-NOTES appears to be a non-inferior alternative to conventional laparoscopy in ectopic pregnancy surgery, with comparable surgical safety and enhanced post-operative comfort. Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to confirm these findings.