DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000039947
Efficacy of radial incision combined with tunnel floating line drainage in the treatment of high posterior horseshoe anal fistula and perianal flora: Randomized control trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Due to the high prevalence of posterior horseshoe anal fistula and causing numerous complications, this study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of radial incision combined with tunnel floating line drainage (RCTD) and arc incision internal drainage in the treatment of the disease and the influence on perianal flora.
METHODS
Ninety-six subjects treated with high posterior horseshoe anal fistula were stochastically assigned to a joint group (RCTD), and control group (arc incision internal drainage). The operation-related conditions, complication rate, anal function, and recurrence rate of 6 months after operation were compared, and perianal secretions were collected before operation and 1 day after operation to detect the changes of microbial flora.
RESULTS
After operation, it was corroborated notable difference between joint group and control group in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, wound healing time, visual analogue scale score 6 hours after operation and phase I cure rate. Chi square test analysis showed notable difference between control group (27.08%) and joint group (10.40%) in incidence of complications, in terms of number of pathogens detected around anus, significantly smaller of the incremental change for the joint subgroup versus the control subgroup 1 day after operation.
CONCLUSION
RCTD can be the best choice for patients with high posterior horseshoe anal fistula. This operation method has the advantages of short operation time, less trauma, fewer complications, fast recovery of anal function, and can also reduce perianal pathogenic bacteria infection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.