MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11606-020-06096-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of general internal medicine · 2020

Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections: a Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial.

Mann Devin, Hess Rachel, McGinn Thomas, Richardson Safiya, Jones Simon, Palmisano Joseph, Chokshi Sara Kuppin, Mishuris Rebecca, McCullagh Lauren, Park Linda, Dinh-Le Catherine, Smith Paul, Feldstein David

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising tool for reducing antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of previously effective CDS on antibiotic-prescribing rates for ARIs when adapted and implemented in diverse primary care settings.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) implementing a CDS tool designed to guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and pneumonia.

SETTING

Two large academic health system primary care networks with a mix of providers.

PARTICIPANTS

All primary care practices within each health system were invited. All providers within participating clinic were considered a participant. Practices were randomized selection to a control or intervention group.

INTERVENTIONS: Intervention practice providers had access to an integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) system designed to determine the risk of bacterial infection from reason for visit of sore throat, cough, or upper respiratory infection and guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME(S): Change in overall antibiotic prescription rates.

MEASURE(S): Frequency, rates, and type of antibiotics prescribed in intervention and controls groups.

RESULTS

33 primary care practices participated with 541 providers and 100,573 patient visits. Intervention providers completed the tool in 6.9% of eligible visits. Antibiotics were prescribed in 35% and 36% of intervention and control visits, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference. There were also no differences in rates of orders for rapid streptococcal tests (RR, 0.94; P = 0.11) or chest X-rays (RR, 1.01; P = 0.999) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The iCPR tool was not effective in reducing antibiotic prescription rates for upper respiratory infections in diverse primary care settings. This has implications for the generalizability of CDS tools as they are adapted to heterogeneous clinical contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02534987). Registered August 26, 2015 at https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Для цитирования: Mann Devin, Hess Rachel, McGinn Thomas, Richardson Safiya, Jones Simon, Palmisano Joseph, Chokshi Sara Kuppin, Mishuris Rebecca, McCullagh Lauren, Park Linda, Dinh-Le Catherine, Smith Paul, Feldstein David. Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections: a Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial.. Journal of general internal medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06096-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.