BMJ open · 2025
Are loneliness and social network size mediators between childhood adversity and depressive symptoms? A cross-sectional replication study in Ethiopia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gerbig Paula, Reinhard Matthias Alexander, Ababu Henok, Rek Stephanie, Amann Benedikt L, Adorjan Kristina, Abera Mubarek, Padberg Frank, Jobst Andrea
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Loneliness and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) constitute significant risk factors for mental disorders, with loneliness emerging as a serious global public health concern. Recent research highlights the role of loneliness as a potential link between early life adversities and current psychopathology. However, most studies have been conducted in high-income, highly individualistic countries. This cross-sectional study explores the interplay between loneliness, social network size, recalled ACEs and depressive symptoms in Ethiopia-a low-income and collectivistic cultural context.
METHODS: The study included 125 psychiatric outpatients at Jimma University Medical Center in Southwest Ethiopia diagnosed with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or psychotic disorders, as well as 131 non-clinical participants. Trained interviewers administered the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Social Network Index and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. We used Mann-Whitney U tests, partial correlation and mediation analysis for data analysis.
RESULTS: We found mild-to-moderate correlations between loneliness and ACEs (clinical group: rho=0.29, p<0.001, 95% CI (0.13 to 0.45); non-clinical group: rho=0.42, p<0.001, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.56)). In both groups, loneliness fully mediated the association between ACEs and depressive symptoms (clinical group: indirect effect a1b1=0.07, 95% CI (0.02 to 0.13); non-clinical group: indirect effect a1b1=0.03, 95% CI (0.01 to 0.07)). In contrast, social network size was neither correlated with ACEs nor did it mediate the association between ACEs and depressive symptoms in either group.
CONCLUSION: This study replicates previous findings that loneliness-rather than social network size-is associated with ACEs and mediates their impact on depressive symptoms. These results support the transcultural and transdiagnostic relevance of loneliness as a universal psychological mechanism, independent of societal structure.
METHODS: The study included 125 psychiatric outpatients at Jimma University Medical Center in Southwest Ethiopia diagnosed with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or psychotic disorders, as well as 131 non-clinical participants. Trained interviewers administered the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Social Network Index and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. We used Mann-Whitney U tests, partial correlation and mediation analysis for data analysis.
RESULTS: We found mild-to-moderate correlations between loneliness and ACEs (clinical group: rho=0.29, p<0.001, 95% CI (0.13 to 0.45); non-clinical group: rho=0.42, p<0.001, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.56)). In both groups, loneliness fully mediated the association between ACEs and depressive symptoms (clinical group: indirect effect a1b1=0.07, 95% CI (0.02 to 0.13); non-clinical group: indirect effect a1b1=0.03, 95% CI (0.01 to 0.07)). In contrast, social network size was neither correlated with ACEs nor did it mediate the association between ACEs and depressive symptoms in either group.
CONCLUSION: This study replicates previous findings that loneliness-rather than social network size-is associated with ACEs and mediates their impact on depressive symptoms. These results support the transcultural and transdiagnostic relevance of loneliness as a universal psychological mechanism, independent of societal structure.