Journal of global health · 2026
Multilevel genomic, transcriptomic, and epidemiologic evidence linking diabetic retinopathy to Alzheimer disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Jing, Liu Qian, Ma Qian, Shen Ting, Xia Jiao, Yang Xiongyi, Liu Kun, Li Na, Yan Biao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and Alzheimer disease (AD) share metabolic and vascular dysfunctions, but the extent to which they reflect overlapping genetic susceptibility and neurovascular-metabolic regulatory pathways remains unclear. We combined multi-omics analyses with population-based data to examine the genetic convergence, cellular pathways, and longitudinal association between DR and AD.
METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) to estimate the association between genetically predicted DR liability and AD risk. We used Bayesian colocalisation analysis to identify shared genomic loci, and summary-data-based MR (SMR) to detect expression-mediated genes jointly associated with DR and AD. We analysed single-cell RNA sequencing data to characterise shared cellular features and related biological pathways. We also conducted an MR-based mediation analysis to explore whether lipid-related, metabolic, or inflammatory traits mediated the observed DR-AD association, and a longitudinal analysis of the UK Biobank cohort to assess the association between DR and incident AD.
RESULTS: With the MR analysis, we found that genetically predicted liability to DR was associated with a modest increase in AD risk. Colocalisation analysis supported a shared genetic signal. We identified three genes with shared expression-mediated associations across DR and AD through SMR. Functional enrichment analyses revealed partially overlapping neurovascular and metabolic pathways. Using MR-based mediation analysis, we found no significant intermediary traits linking DR and AD. Findings from the UK Biobank cohort were directionally consistent with the genetic analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic liability to DR is associated with an increased risk of AD and is accompanied by shared expression-mediated effects and convergent neurovascular-metabolic pathways. These findings support the possibility that DR may serve as a clinically accessible indicator of increased neurodegenerative vulnerability.
METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) to estimate the association between genetically predicted DR liability and AD risk. We used Bayesian colocalisation analysis to identify shared genomic loci, and summary-data-based MR (SMR) to detect expression-mediated genes jointly associated with DR and AD. We analysed single-cell RNA sequencing data to characterise shared cellular features and related biological pathways. We also conducted an MR-based mediation analysis to explore whether lipid-related, metabolic, or inflammatory traits mediated the observed DR-AD association, and a longitudinal analysis of the UK Biobank cohort to assess the association between DR and incident AD.
RESULTS: With the MR analysis, we found that genetically predicted liability to DR was associated with a modest increase in AD risk. Colocalisation analysis supported a shared genetic signal. We identified three genes with shared expression-mediated associations across DR and AD through SMR. Functional enrichment analyses revealed partially overlapping neurovascular and metabolic pathways. Using MR-based mediation analysis, we found no significant intermediary traits linking DR and AD. Findings from the UK Biobank cohort were directionally consistent with the genetic analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic liability to DR is associated with an increased risk of AD and is accompanied by shared expression-mediated effects and convergent neurovascular-metabolic pathways. These findings support the possibility that DR may serve as a clinically accessible indicator of increased neurodegenerative vulnerability.