Open veterinary journal · 2025
Interobserver agreement of retrospective renal pelvis measurements in cats with confirmed ureteral obstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
White Mason, Adezio Andrew, Flatz Katharina, Hoffmann Karon, Kennedy Alexandra, Lam Richard, Lau Michelle, Siow Jia Wen, White Joanna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sonographic measurement of the renal pelvis is often used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral obstruction. However, much of the veterinary literature fails to detail the measurement techniques utilized.
AIM: This study of renal pelvis assessment methods aimed to compare the interobserver variability of subjective assessments with that of standardized, objective measurements.
METHODS: Sonographic images of the renal pelvis from 15 cats with fluoroscopically confirmed ureteral obstruction were reviewed by six independent observers using 11 methods. Subjective (3) and objective (8) assessments of renal pelvic size in the dorsal, sagittal and transverse planes were created (45 images). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interobserver agreement for each measurement method. A two-way random effect model and a single rater (quantitative) and Fleiss (categorical) kappa were calculated.
RESULTS: Subjective assessment methods had the lowest interobserver agreement in every plane (transverse: κ = 0.326, sagittal: κ = 0.311, dorsal: κ = 0.473). The standardized measurements with the highest interobserver agreement measured the distance between the renal crest and the ureter in dorsal (ICC = 0.91) and transverse planes (ICC = 0.907).
CONCLUSION: Subjective assessment of pyelectasia is variable, and standardized measurements should be used when sonographically assessing renal pelvic size. Consistent use of the method with the greatest interobserver agreement is likely to improve comparability between studies and ensure appropriate implementation of their findings in a clinical setting.
AIM: This study of renal pelvis assessment methods aimed to compare the interobserver variability of subjective assessments with that of standardized, objective measurements.
METHODS: Sonographic images of the renal pelvis from 15 cats with fluoroscopically confirmed ureteral obstruction were reviewed by six independent observers using 11 methods. Subjective (3) and objective (8) assessments of renal pelvic size in the dorsal, sagittal and transverse planes were created (45 images). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interobserver agreement for each measurement method. A two-way random effect model and a single rater (quantitative) and Fleiss (categorical) kappa were calculated.
RESULTS: Subjective assessment methods had the lowest interobserver agreement in every plane (transverse: κ = 0.326, sagittal: κ = 0.311, dorsal: κ = 0.473). The standardized measurements with the highest interobserver agreement measured the distance between the renal crest and the ureter in dorsal (ICC = 0.91) and transverse planes (ICC = 0.907).
CONCLUSION: Subjective assessment of pyelectasia is variable, and standardized measurements should be used when sonographically assessing renal pelvic size. Consistent use of the method with the greatest interobserver agreement is likely to improve comparability between studies and ensure appropriate implementation of their findings in a clinical setting.