The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 1996
Lung retransplantation: institutional report on a series of twenty patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wekerle T, Klepetko W, Wisser W, Senbaklavaci O, Moidl R, Hiesmayer M, Tschernko E, Wolner E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 1995, 124 isolated lung and 29 combined heart-lung transplantations were performed at our institution. Twenty of these procedures were retransplantations. Four different types of reoperations were performed: ipsilateral single lung retransplantation (n = 3), single lung retransplantation after bilateral or heart-lung transplantation (n = 7), bilateral retransplantation after bilateral lung transplantation (n = 5), and bilateral retransplantation after single lung transplantation (n = 5). Nine patients underwent retransplantation while still in the intensive care unit after the primary transplantation. Indications for retransplantation in these patients were primary graft failure in seven and bronchial complications in two patients. In 11 patients a late retransplantation (3 to 30 months after the first transplantation) was performed. The indication was obliterative bronchiolitis in nine and late bronchial complications in two patients. Overall, 13 patients were ventilator-dependent before retransplantations.
RESULTS: Overall survival was 52.8% and 36.2% at 1 and 12 months, respectively. For early retransplantation the survival rate at 1 month was only 22.2% with 2 patients alive 5 and 22 months after the retransplantation. For late retransplantation survival at 1 and 12 months was 70.7% and 50.5%, respectively (p = 0.07), and the longest surviving patient was at 47 months after retransplantation at the time this article was written. Patients who were ventilator-dependent before retransplantation had a significantly worse outcome (survival at 1 and 12 months: 33.8% and 25.4% versus 85.7% and 57.1% for all others, p = 0.055). Of those surviving to date, all were in New York Heart Association class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that late and elective lung retransplantation achieves acceptable results when offered to patients with chronic pulmonary dysfunction but with otherwise stable conditions. In view of the poor results, early acute retransplantation should be performed much more restrictively.
RESULTS: Overall survival was 52.8% and 36.2% at 1 and 12 months, respectively. For early retransplantation the survival rate at 1 month was only 22.2% with 2 patients alive 5 and 22 months after the retransplantation. For late retransplantation survival at 1 and 12 months was 70.7% and 50.5%, respectively (p = 0.07), and the longest surviving patient was at 47 months after retransplantation at the time this article was written. Patients who were ventilator-dependent before retransplantation had a significantly worse outcome (survival at 1 and 12 months: 33.8% and 25.4% versus 85.7% and 57.1% for all others, p = 0.055). Of those surviving to date, all were in New York Heart Association class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that late and elective lung retransplantation achieves acceptable results when offered to patients with chronic pulmonary dysfunction but with otherwise stable conditions. In view of the poor results, early acute retransplantation should be performed much more restrictively.