The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022
Inpatient Type 1 Thyroplasty Versus Injection Laryngoplasty for Vocal Fold Movement Impairment After Extent type I and II Aortic Repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pinzas Lauren A, Chen Diane W, Liou Nelson Eddie, Donovan Donald T, Ongkasuwan Julina
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE: Vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) due to neuronal injury is a known complication following thoracic aortic repair that can impair pulmonary toilet function and post-operative recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient vocal fold medialization for VFMI after aortic surgery.
DESIGN: A 15-year retrospective chart review (2005-2019) of 259 patients with postoperative VFMI after thoracic aortic surgery registry was conducted. Data included demographics, surgery characteristics, laryngology exam, and postoperative clinical outcomes. Medialization procedures consisted of type 1 thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty.
SETTING: Tertiary care hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients (median age 61, 71% male) with VFMI post-thoracic aortic repair met inclusion criteria; inpatient vocal fold medialization was performed for 203 (78%) patients. One hundred and twenty-six. (49%) received type 1 thyroplasty and 77 (30%) received injection laryngoplasty procedures at a median 7 days (IQR 5-8 days) from extubation.
MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary study outcome measurements consisted of median LOS, median ICU LOS, complications intra- and postoperatively, and pulmonary complications (post-medialization bronchoscopies, pneumonia, tracheostomy, etc.).
RESULTS: Post-medialization bronchoscopy rates were significantly lower in the medialization (n = 11) versus the non-medialization group (n = 8) (5% vs 14%, P = .02) and significantly higher in the injection laryngoplasty group (n = 77) versus thyroplasty group (n = 126) (10% vs 2%, P = .02). Further analysis revealed no significant difference in overall LOS and pulmonary complications between the techniques.
CONCLUSION: Inpatient thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty are both effective vocal fold medialization techniques after extent I and II aortic repair. Thyroplasty may have a small pulmonary toilet advantage, as measured by need for post-medialization bronchoscopy, compared to injection laryngoplasty.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient vocal fold medialization for VFMI after aortic surgery.
DESIGN: A 15-year retrospective chart review (2005-2019) of 259 patients with postoperative VFMI after thoracic aortic surgery registry was conducted. Data included demographics, surgery characteristics, laryngology exam, and postoperative clinical outcomes. Medialization procedures consisted of type 1 thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty.
SETTING: Tertiary care hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients (median age 61, 71% male) with VFMI post-thoracic aortic repair met inclusion criteria; inpatient vocal fold medialization was performed for 203 (78%) patients. One hundred and twenty-six. (49%) received type 1 thyroplasty and 77 (30%) received injection laryngoplasty procedures at a median 7 days (IQR 5-8 days) from extubation.
MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary study outcome measurements consisted of median LOS, median ICU LOS, complications intra- and postoperatively, and pulmonary complications (post-medialization bronchoscopies, pneumonia, tracheostomy, etc.).
RESULTS: Post-medialization bronchoscopy rates were significantly lower in the medialization (n = 11) versus the non-medialization group (n = 8) (5% vs 14%, P = .02) and significantly higher in the injection laryngoplasty group (n = 77) versus thyroplasty group (n = 126) (10% vs 2%, P = .02). Further analysis revealed no significant difference in overall LOS and pulmonary complications between the techniques.
CONCLUSION: Inpatient thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty are both effective vocal fold medialization techniques after extent I and II aortic repair. Thyroplasty may have a small pulmonary toilet advantage, as measured by need for post-medialization bronchoscopy, compared to injection laryngoplasty.