Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2019
Low-Intensity vs High-Intensity Home-Based Treadmill Training and Walking Attainment in Young Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mattern-Baxter Katrin, Looper Julia, Zhou Chuan, Bjornson Kristie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of low-intensity (LI) vs high-intensity (HI) treadmill training (TT) on walking attainment and overall walking activity in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
DESIGN: Prospective, multisite, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Homes of the participants.
PARTICIPANTS: Children with spastic diplegic CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System Level I and II, ages 14-32 months (N=19; male, n=8).
INTERVENTIONS: The children were randomized to LI TT (2×/wk for 6wk) (n=10) and HI TT (10×/wk for 6wk) (n=9). The TT was carried out by the families with weekly instruction by the researchers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children were assessed at study onset, post intervention, and 1 and 4 months post intervention with the Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension D/E (GMFM D/E), average strides per day and percentage of time spent walking with accelerometers, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Index Mobility Scale, timed 10-m and 1-minute walk test, and Functional Mobility Scale. Blinding was conducted for GMFM D/E and PDMS-2. Linear mixed effects regression models were applied to all outcomes.
RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were found in any outcome measure at any of the time points. Children in the HI group did not show significant improvement immediately following the intervention in GMFM E (P=.061), while children in the LI group did (P=.003), but no statistically significant differences were detected over time (P=.71). Children in the HI group showed better walking independence on the Functional Mobility Scale at all postintervention assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: A twice-weekly dosage was equally effective in improving skills related to walking compared with a 10×/wk program and can be more readily implemented into clinical practice.
DESIGN: Prospective, multisite, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Homes of the participants.
PARTICIPANTS: Children with spastic diplegic CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System Level I and II, ages 14-32 months (N=19; male, n=8).
INTERVENTIONS: The children were randomized to LI TT (2×/wk for 6wk) (n=10) and HI TT (10×/wk for 6wk) (n=9). The TT was carried out by the families with weekly instruction by the researchers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children were assessed at study onset, post intervention, and 1 and 4 months post intervention with the Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension D/E (GMFM D/E), average strides per day and percentage of time spent walking with accelerometers, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Index Mobility Scale, timed 10-m and 1-minute walk test, and Functional Mobility Scale. Blinding was conducted for GMFM D/E and PDMS-2. Linear mixed effects regression models were applied to all outcomes.
RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were found in any outcome measure at any of the time points. Children in the HI group did not show significant improvement immediately following the intervention in GMFM E (P=.061), while children in the LI group did (P=.003), but no statistically significant differences were detected over time (P=.71). Children in the HI group showed better walking independence on the Functional Mobility Scale at all postintervention assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: A twice-weekly dosage was equally effective in improving skills related to walking compared with a 10×/wk program and can be more readily implemented into clinical practice.