World journal of urology · 2026
External validation of the VOID predictive model for sacral neuromodulation in non-obstructive urinary retention and/or slow urinary stream.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Demetriou Stéphane, Dequirez Pierre-Luc, Ducrot Quentin, Paris Havana, Toubol Sidonie, Khalil Nour, Arber Théo, Ruffion Alain, Leroy Maxime, Mazeaud Charles, Phé Véronique, Perrouin-Verbe Marie-Aimée, Peyronnet Benoit, Brierre Thibault, Game Xavier, Biardeau Xavier
Аннотация
PURPOSE: A multivariable predictive model for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) success in non-obstructive urinary retention and/or slow urinary stream (NOUR/SS), named VOID, was recently developed and internally validated. We aimed to externally validate this model.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included all patients undergoing a two-stage SNM for NOUR/SS between 2018 and 2025 across 7 academic centers. The primary outcome was defined as the permanent implantation rate. Secondary outcomes included changes in bladder voiding parameters. Model performance was assessed through discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration (graphical assessment), and overall performance (Brier score).
RESULTS: Of 239 patients included, 152 (63.6%) underwent permanent implantation. The model showed fair discrimination (AUC = 0.627) and poor overall accuracy (Brier score = 0.221). Calibration analysis indicated imperfect agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Among the original predictors, only female sex remained independently associated with implantation (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14-3.79; p = 0.017), while age ≤ 52 years showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.074). Maximal urethral closure pressure ≥ 70 cmH₂O and absence of neurological disease affecting the lower motor neuron were not associated with the outcome. The retrospective design and heterogeneity across centers represent the main limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: The VOID model demonstrated only fair discrimination and suboptimal calibration, precluding immediate clinical use without prior recalibration. Beyond methodological limitations, these findings suggest that underperformance may reflect the inherent constraints of a purely clinicourodynamic paradigm, underscoring the need for conceptually refined models integrating broader determinants of SNM response.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included all patients undergoing a two-stage SNM for NOUR/SS between 2018 and 2025 across 7 academic centers. The primary outcome was defined as the permanent implantation rate. Secondary outcomes included changes in bladder voiding parameters. Model performance was assessed through discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration (graphical assessment), and overall performance (Brier score).
RESULTS: Of 239 patients included, 152 (63.6%) underwent permanent implantation. The model showed fair discrimination (AUC = 0.627) and poor overall accuracy (Brier score = 0.221). Calibration analysis indicated imperfect agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Among the original predictors, only female sex remained independently associated with implantation (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14-3.79; p = 0.017), while age ≤ 52 years showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.074). Maximal urethral closure pressure ≥ 70 cmH₂O and absence of neurological disease affecting the lower motor neuron were not associated with the outcome. The retrospective design and heterogeneity across centers represent the main limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: The VOID model demonstrated only fair discrimination and suboptimal calibration, precluding immediate clinical use without prior recalibration. Beyond methodological limitations, these findings suggest that underperformance may reflect the inherent constraints of a purely clinicourodynamic paradigm, underscoring the need for conceptually refined models integrating broader determinants of SNM response.