MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2019

Evaluation of Voice Quality in Patients With Vocal Fold Polyps: The Size of a Polyp Matters or Does it?

Öcal Bülent, Tatar Emel Ç, Toptaş Gökhan, Barmak Elife, Saylam Güleser, Korkmaz Mehmet H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between morphological features of vocal fold polyps (VFPs) and subjective/objective voice parameters.

METHODS

Perceptual evaluations, aerodynamic and acoustic tests were performed on 47 patients with VFPs. Still images were captured from video and the morphological features associated with the size of VFP were quantified. To reveal the correlation between size-related morphological features (length of polyp base, the ratio of polyp base to vocal fold length, glottal gap area) and objective/subjective parameters of voice, Pearson's and Spearman's tests were carried out.

RESULTS

This cohort was composed of 30 (63.8 %) male and 17 (36.2%) female patients with the mean age of 45.2 years and 41.3 years, respectively. No correlation was found between the morphological features of VFPs and any of perceptual, aerodynamic and acoustic voice parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that controversies still exist regarding the role of vocal fold polyp morphology in clinical decision making.

Для цитирования: Öcal Bülent, Tatar Emel Ç, Toptaş Gökhan, Barmak Elife, Saylam Güleser, Korkmaz Mehmet H. Evaluation of Voice Quality in Patients With Vocal Fold Polyps: The Size of a Polyp Matters or Does it?. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.