MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/tomography8030122

Медицинская библиотека · Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022

What Findings on Chest CTs Can Delay Diagnosis of Pleuropulmonary Paragonimiasis?

Li Kai Ke, Jin Gong Yong, Kwon Keun Sang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate which findings were delayed in diagnosis with respect to chest CT findings of paragonimiasis.

METHODS

This retrospective, informed questionnaire study was conducted to evaluate chest CT scans of 103 patients (58 men and 45 women; mean age 46.1 ± 14.6 years). The patients were diagnosed with paragonimiasis from 2003 to 2008 in four tertiary hospitals. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test to identify differences between an initially correct diagnosis and an incorrect one of paragonimiasis on chest CT scans, for which we evaluated such variables as the location of lesion, type of parenchymal lesions, and worm migration track.

RESULTS

Nodular opacities on chest CT scans were the most common findings (53/94, 56.4%). The sign of worm migration tracks was only present in 18.1% of cases (17/94). Although statistically insignificant, the form of consolidation (18/25, 72%) and mass (6/8, 75%) on CT was common in correct diagnostics, and the form of the worm migration track (12/17, 70.6%) was high in correct diagnostics.

CONCLUSION

A delayed diagnosis of paragonimiasis may often be made in patients with non-nodular, parenchymal lesions who are negative for worm migration track on chest CT scans.

Для цитирования: Li Kai Ke, Jin Gong Yong, Kwon Keun Sang. What Findings on Chest CTs Can Delay Diagnosis of Pleuropulmonary Paragonimiasis?. Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.). 2022. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8030122.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.