European journal of neurology · 2024
Clinical and neuroimaging precursors in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: impact of the Boston criteria version 2.0.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weidauer Stefan, Tafreshi Mona, Förch Christian, Hattingen Elke, Arendt Christophe T, Friedauer Lucie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the Boston criteria version 2.0 facilitates the sensitivity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) diagnosis, there are only limited data about precursor symptoms. This study aimed to determine the impact of neurological and imaging features in relation to the time of CAA diagnosis.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with probable CAA according to the Boston criteria version 1.5, treated between 2010 and 2020 in our neurocentre, were identified through a keyword search in our medical database. Neuroimaging was assessed using Boston criteria versions 1.5 and 2.0. Medical records with primary focus on the clinical course and the occurrence of transient focal neurological episodes were prospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight out of 81 patients (46.9%) exhibited transient focal neurological episodes, most often sensory (13.2%) or aphasic disorders (13.2%), or permanent deficits at a mean time interval of 31.1 months (SD ±26.3; range 1-108 months) before diagnosis of probable CAA (Boston criteria version 1.5). If using Boston criteria version 2.0, all patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) met the criteria for probable CAA, and diagnosis could have been made on average 44 months earlier. Four patients were younger than 50 years, three of them with supporting pathology. Cognitive deficits were most common (34.6%) at the time of diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-haemorrhagic MRI markers enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing probable CAA; however, further prospective studies are proposed to establish a minimum age for inclusion. As the neurological overture of CAA may occur several years before clinical diagnosis, early clarification by MRI including haemosensitive sequences are suggested.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with probable CAA according to the Boston criteria version 1.5, treated between 2010 and 2020 in our neurocentre, were identified through a keyword search in our medical database. Neuroimaging was assessed using Boston criteria versions 1.5 and 2.0. Medical records with primary focus on the clinical course and the occurrence of transient focal neurological episodes were prospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight out of 81 patients (46.9%) exhibited transient focal neurological episodes, most often sensory (13.2%) or aphasic disorders (13.2%), or permanent deficits at a mean time interval of 31.1 months (SD ±26.3; range 1-108 months) before diagnosis of probable CAA (Boston criteria version 1.5). If using Boston criteria version 2.0, all patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) met the criteria for probable CAA, and diagnosis could have been made on average 44 months earlier. Four patients were younger than 50 years, three of them with supporting pathology. Cognitive deficits were most common (34.6%) at the time of diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-haemorrhagic MRI markers enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing probable CAA; however, further prospective studies are proposed to establish a minimum age for inclusion. As the neurological overture of CAA may occur several years before clinical diagnosis, early clarification by MRI including haemosensitive sequences are suggested.