The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
Abatacept Use Is Associated with Steroid Dose Reduction and Improvement in Fatigue and CD4-Dysregulation in CVID Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
von Spee-Mayer Caroline, Echternach Constanze, Agarwal Prerana, Gutenberger Sylvia, Soetedjo Veronika, Goldacker Sigune, Warnatz Klaus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a severe clinical manifestation of systemic immune dysregulation in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Its treatment often requires systemic immunosuppression beyond corticosteroids.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with CVID and ILD.
METHODS: Ten patients with confirmed diagnosis of CVID and ILD were included in a single-center, prospective, open-label, nonrandomized trial. Abatacept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 125 mg/wk for 12 months.
RESULTS: Abatacept was a safe treatment for ILD in CVID except for 1 case of bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. One additional patient terminated the trial prematurely because of recurrent bronchitis. Five of 8 patients treated per protocol benefited from the treatment according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria. The primary end point of the study was met because single breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was stable (62.5%) or improved (37.5%) in all patients treated per protocol. Although nodules (71%) and ground-glass opacities (57%) improved in most patients, other computed tomography pathologies were less responsive. Quality of life improved in 87.5% and fatigue in 57% of patients. Abatacept treatment was associated with significant improvement in CD4 T-cell dysregulation, signified by a decrease in serum soluble IL-2 receptor levels and of proliferating Ki67+ CD4 T cells, and a recovery of total lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and naive CD4 T cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept may represent a treatment option for CVID-associated ILD. This pilot study demonstrated a good safety profile, steroid-sparing effect, positive immune modulation, and overall positive treatment response especially in quality of life. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with CVID and ILD.
METHODS: Ten patients with confirmed diagnosis of CVID and ILD were included in a single-center, prospective, open-label, nonrandomized trial. Abatacept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 125 mg/wk for 12 months.
RESULTS: Abatacept was a safe treatment for ILD in CVID except for 1 case of bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. One additional patient terminated the trial prematurely because of recurrent bronchitis. Five of 8 patients treated per protocol benefited from the treatment according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria. The primary end point of the study was met because single breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was stable (62.5%) or improved (37.5%) in all patients treated per protocol. Although nodules (71%) and ground-glass opacities (57%) improved in most patients, other computed tomography pathologies were less responsive. Quality of life improved in 87.5% and fatigue in 57% of patients. Abatacept treatment was associated with significant improvement in CD4 T-cell dysregulation, signified by a decrease in serum soluble IL-2 receptor levels and of proliferating Ki67+ CD4 T cells, and a recovery of total lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and naive CD4 T cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept may represent a treatment option for CVID-associated ILD. This pilot study demonstrated a good safety profile, steroid-sparing effect, positive immune modulation, and overall positive treatment response especially in quality of life. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.