MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics16152328

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Diagnostic Yield of Routine Pericardial Fluid Cultures and Clinical Predictors of Bacterial Pericarditis.

Orlev Amir, Yefet Alon Ze'ev, Bdolah-Abram Tali, Asher Elad, Wiener-Well Yonit

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Pericardial effusion has a broad differential diagnosis, whereas bacterial pericarditis is rare. Despite this, routine culturing of pericardial fluid is frequently performed, and its diagnostic yield remains uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all pericardial fluid cultures obtained at a tertiary medical center between January 2016 and May 2024. Cultures were classified as true positive if a recognized bacterial pathogen was isolated or if it was deemed clinically pathogenic by an infectious disease's specialist at the medical record. Contaminants were defined according to CDC criteria. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables were analyzed using univariate testing and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Among 198 eligible pericardial fluid cultures, 8 (4%) yielded true bacterial pathogens, whereas 43 (23%) grew contaminants and 147 (73%) remained sterile. Thus, contaminant growth occurred more than five times as frequently as that of true pathogens. The most frequent pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species. No demographic features, presenting symptoms, or imaging findings were associated with culture positivity. In multivariable analysis, concurrent bacteremia (odds ratio [OR] 17.49; p = 0.002) and higher peripheral neutrophil percentage (OR 1.20; p = 0.012) independently predicted bacterial pericarditis. In models incorporating pericardial fluid cell counts, a lower mononuclear cell percentage was also independently associated with infection (OR 0.91; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Bacterial pericarditis is uncommon, and routine pericardial fluid cultures, of all pericardial fluid specimens, have a low diagnostic yield with substantial contamination. Laboratory markers, particularly bacteremia and neutrophilia, may help identify patients most likely to benefit from culture. A selective, laboratory-guided approach may improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce unnecessary testing.

Для цитирования: Orlev Amir, Yefet Alon Ze'ev, Bdolah-Abram Tali, Asher Elad, Wiener-Well Yonit. Diagnostic Yield of Routine Pericardial Fluid Cultures and Clinical Predictors of Bacterial Pericarditis.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2026. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16152328.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.