Journal of the neurological sciences · 2020
Neuroimaging findings in headache with normal neurologic examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamtchum-Tatuene Joseph, Kenteu Bernold, Fogang Yannick F, Zafack Joseline G, Nyaga Ulrich Flore, Noubiap Jean Jacques
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pooled estimates of the prevalence of unexpected findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination support current expert opinion-based neuroimaging guidelines.
METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination up to September 30, 2017. The overall and disease-specific prevalence of unexpected findings were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42017079714.
RESULTS: In forty-one studies including 15,760 participants, the overall prevalence of unexpected findings and normal variants was 17.5% (95% CI: 13.1-22.3). The prevalence was 26.6% (95% CI: 15.5-39.4) in studies using MRI only. The prevalence of vascular, neoplastic, and non-neoplastic findings was 6.6%, 1.4%, and 9.6%. The pooled disease-specific prevalence was 2.0% for stroke, 1.8% for aneurysms, 0.8% for subdural hematoma, 0.7% for hydrocephalus, 0.2% for glioma, and 0.1% for meningioma. In secondary analysis, there was 0.4% increase in the prevalence of vascular unexpected findings with each 1% increase in the proportion of migraine with aura (p-value for meta-regression = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with headache and normal neurologic examination, important vascular and neoplastic unexpected findings are rare and better detected with MRI. This supports current American College of Radiology and European Headache Federation recommendations to avoid systematic imaging in such patients and prefer MRI when imaging is needed.
METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination up to September 30, 2017. The overall and disease-specific prevalence of unexpected findings were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42017079714.
RESULTS: In forty-one studies including 15,760 participants, the overall prevalence of unexpected findings and normal variants was 17.5% (95% CI: 13.1-22.3). The prevalence was 26.6% (95% CI: 15.5-39.4) in studies using MRI only. The prevalence of vascular, neoplastic, and non-neoplastic findings was 6.6%, 1.4%, and 9.6%. The pooled disease-specific prevalence was 2.0% for stroke, 1.8% for aneurysms, 0.8% for subdural hematoma, 0.7% for hydrocephalus, 0.2% for glioma, and 0.1% for meningioma. In secondary analysis, there was 0.4% increase in the prevalence of vascular unexpected findings with each 1% increase in the proportion of migraine with aura (p-value for meta-regression = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with headache and normal neurologic examination, important vascular and neoplastic unexpected findings are rare and better detected with MRI. This supports current American College of Radiology and European Headache Federation recommendations to avoid systematic imaging in such patients and prefer MRI when imaging is needed.