The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
Benchmarking 54 large language model configurations for CAD-RADS scoring: open-weight models approach human-level agreement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sandfort Veit, Vigneault Davis M, Willemink Martin J, Wu Jie, Hallett Richard L, Nieman Koen, Fleischmann Dominik, Mastrodicasa Domenico
Аннотация
The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) standardizes coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reporting, but not all reports contain CAD-RADS classifications. We benchmarked 54 large language model (LLM) configurations across 50 distinct models, including recent proprietary and open-weight reasoning models, for zero-shot CAD-RADS classification. We retrospectively analyzed 500 anonymized CCTA reports from four hospitals across three U.S. regions. Expert cardiovascular radiologists provided the reference standard (human inter-rater [Formula: see text]). Fifty-four model configurations (50 distinct LLMs; four configurable models tested in both thinking and non-thinking modes) spanning Llama 2 7B through recent thinking models (DeepCogito v2, Gemini 3 Pro) processed reports using identical zero-shot prompts. Performance was measured with unweighted Cohen's κ. Two LLMs met both pre-specified non-inferiority criteria ([Formula: see text] margin and entire 95% CI within the human inter-rater agreement band, [Formula: see text]-0.956): Claude 4.6 Opus ([Formula: see text], 95% CI 0.817-0.889) and the open-weight Gemma 4 31B ([Formula: see text], 95% CI 0.810-0.882), which ranked second overall. Both met the criteria at the pre-specified [Formula: see text] margin; at [Formula: see text] no model qualified. On the reports originally dictated without a CAD-RADS statement (n=343), the top models reached [Formula: see text]. Performance declined with longer thinking chains (proxy for case complexity), but thinking-mode outperformed non-thinking mode on matched difficult reports. Gemma 4 31B remained non-inferior at 3-bit quantization and fits on a 24 GB consumer GPU. Current LLMs extract the CAD-RADS stenosis severity category from unstructured CCTA reports with agreement approaching the human inter-rater band, without task-specific training. Our data shows the remarkable rise of open models. A 31B open-weight model matched top proprietary systems and runs on consumer GPUs, enabling privacy-preserving local deployment for clinical data mining.