Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2022
Evaluation of primary and accessory respiratory muscles and their influence on exercise capacity and dyspnea in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Durdu Habibe, Demir Rengin, Zeren Melih, Basturk Pınar, Arabaci Hidayet Ozan, Sinan Umit Yasar, Kucukoglu Mehmet Serdar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Skeletal and respiratory muscle disfunction has been described in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), however, involvement of accessory respiratory muscles and their association with symptomatology in PAH is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the primary and accessory respiratory muscles and their influence on exercise tolerance and dyspnea.
METHODS: 27 patients and 27 healthy controls were included. Serratus anterior (SA), pectoralis muscles (PM) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle strength were evaluated as accessory respiratory muscles, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) as primary respiratory muscles, and quadriceps as peripheral muscle. Exercise capacity was evaluated with 6-min walk test (6MWT), dyspnea with modified Medical Council Research (MMRC) and London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scales.
RESULTS: All evaluated muscles, except SCM, and 6MWT were decreased in patient group (p < 0.01). SA was the most affected muscle among primary and accessory respiratory muscles (Cohen's-d = 1.35). All evaluated muscles significantly correlated to 6MWT (r = 0.428-0.525). A multivariate model including SA, SCM and MIP was the best model for predicting 6MWT (R = 0.606; R2 = 0.368; p = 0.013) and SA strength had the most impact on the 6MWT (B = 1.242; β = 0.340). None of the models including respiratory muscles were able to predict dyspnea, however PM and SA strength correlated to LCADL total (r = -0.493) and MMRC (r = -0.523), respectively.
CONCLUSION: SCM may be excessively used in PAH since it retains its strength. Considering the relationship of accessory respiratory muscles with exercise tolerance and dyspnea, monitoring the strength of these muscles in the clinical practice may help providing better management for PAH.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the primary and accessory respiratory muscles and their influence on exercise tolerance and dyspnea.
METHODS: 27 patients and 27 healthy controls were included. Serratus anterior (SA), pectoralis muscles (PM) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle strength were evaluated as accessory respiratory muscles, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) as primary respiratory muscles, and quadriceps as peripheral muscle. Exercise capacity was evaluated with 6-min walk test (6MWT), dyspnea with modified Medical Council Research (MMRC) and London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scales.
RESULTS: All evaluated muscles, except SCM, and 6MWT were decreased in patient group (p < 0.01). SA was the most affected muscle among primary and accessory respiratory muscles (Cohen's-d = 1.35). All evaluated muscles significantly correlated to 6MWT (r = 0.428-0.525). A multivariate model including SA, SCM and MIP was the best model for predicting 6MWT (R = 0.606; R2 = 0.368; p = 0.013) and SA strength had the most impact on the 6MWT (B = 1.242; β = 0.340). None of the models including respiratory muscles were able to predict dyspnea, however PM and SA strength correlated to LCADL total (r = -0.493) and MMRC (r = -0.523), respectively.
CONCLUSION: SCM may be excessively used in PAH since it retains its strength. Considering the relationship of accessory respiratory muscles with exercise tolerance and dyspnea, monitoring the strength of these muscles in the clinical practice may help providing better management for PAH.