Diabetes & vascular disease research · 2020
An optical coherence tomography comparison of coronary arterial plaque calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weber Joseph R, Martin Brendan, Kassis Nicholas, Shah Kunal, Kovarnik Tomas, Mattix-Kramer Holly, Lopez John J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Coronary arterial plaques in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are assumed to have increased calcification due to underlying renal disease or initiation of dialysis. This relationship may be confounded by comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).
METHODS: From a single-center OCT registry, 60 patients were analyzed. Twenty patients with ESRD and diabetes (ESRD-DM) were compared to 2 groups of non-ESRD patients: 20 with and 20 without diabetes. In each patient, one 20 mm segment within the culprit vessel was analyzed.
RESULTS: ESRD-DM patients exhibited similar calcium burden, arc, and area compared to patients with diabetes alone. When compared to patients without diabetes, patients with diabetes exhibited a greater summed area of calcium (DM: Median 9.0, IQR [5.3-28] mm2 vs Non-DM: 3.5 [0.1-14] mm2, p = 0.04) and larger calcium deposits by arc (DM: Mean 45 ± SE 6.2° vs Non-DM: 21 ± 6.2°, p = 0.01) and area (DM: 0.58 ± 0.10 mm2 vs Non-DM: 0.26 ± 0.10 mm2, p = 0.03). Calcification deposits in ESRD-DM patients (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) and patients with diabetes (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) were more superficially located relative to patients without diabetes (0.21 ± 0.02 mm), p = 0.01 for both.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary calcification in DM and ESRD-DM groups exhibited similar burden, deposit size, and depth within the arterial wall. The increase in coronary calcification and cardiovascular disease events seen in ESRD-DM patients may not be secondary to ESRD and dialysis, but instead due to a combination of declining renal function and diabetes.
METHODS: From a single-center OCT registry, 60 patients were analyzed. Twenty patients with ESRD and diabetes (ESRD-DM) were compared to 2 groups of non-ESRD patients: 20 with and 20 without diabetes. In each patient, one 20 mm segment within the culprit vessel was analyzed.
RESULTS: ESRD-DM patients exhibited similar calcium burden, arc, and area compared to patients with diabetes alone. When compared to patients without diabetes, patients with diabetes exhibited a greater summed area of calcium (DM: Median 9.0, IQR [5.3-28] mm2 vs Non-DM: 3.5 [0.1-14] mm2, p = 0.04) and larger calcium deposits by arc (DM: Mean 45 ± SE 6.2° vs Non-DM: 21 ± 6.2°, p = 0.01) and area (DM: 0.58 ± 0.10 mm2 vs Non-DM: 0.26 ± 0.10 mm2, p = 0.03). Calcification deposits in ESRD-DM patients (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) and patients with diabetes (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) were more superficially located relative to patients without diabetes (0.21 ± 0.02 mm), p = 0.01 for both.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary calcification in DM and ESRD-DM groups exhibited similar burden, deposit size, and depth within the arterial wall. The increase in coronary calcification and cardiovascular disease events seen in ESRD-DM patients may not be secondary to ESRD and dialysis, but instead due to a combination of declining renal function and diabetes.