European heart journal. Case reports · 2026
Management of secondary aorto-oesophageal fistula after aortic arch replacement: a case report without aortic reconstruction.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saeki Waka, Kurobe Hirotsugu, Higaki Tomohide, Oshikiri Taro, Izutani Hironori
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Secondary aorto-oesophageal fistula (AEF) after aortic aneurysm repair is a rare but clinically catastrophic complication. Conservative management is associated with an unacceptably high risk of mortality, primarily due to severe infections. Although definitive in situ aortic reconstruction may be curative, it is highly invasive and carries substantial peri-operative morbidity and mortality, particularly in frail patients or those with established infection. This case report describes the successful treatment of a secondary AEF without aortic arch reconstruction, achieving durable long-term infection control.
CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital with haematemesis, and a pseudoaneurysm was identified at the distal anastomosis site following total aortic arch replacement. Emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed as a life-saving measure to achieve rapid haemostasis and stabilization. One month later, persistent fever and a residual oesophageal perforation prompted oesophagectomy with omental flap placement, without aortic arch reconstruction. Gastric conduit reconstruction was performed 4 months after TEVAR. The patient has remained event-free for more than 1 year after the initial presentation and intervention.
DISCUSSION: This case highlights the importance of an individualized treatment strategy for secondary AEF. In selected patients, infection control may be achieved without aortic arch reconstruction.
CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital with haematemesis, and a pseudoaneurysm was identified at the distal anastomosis site following total aortic arch replacement. Emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed as a life-saving measure to achieve rapid haemostasis and stabilization. One month later, persistent fever and a residual oesophageal perforation prompted oesophagectomy with omental flap placement, without aortic arch reconstruction. Gastric conduit reconstruction was performed 4 months after TEVAR. The patient has remained event-free for more than 1 year after the initial presentation and intervention.
DISCUSSION: This case highlights the importance of an individualized treatment strategy for secondary AEF. In selected patients, infection control may be achieved without aortic arch reconstruction.