Journal of affective disorders · 2026
The experience of community-based peer support groups for people living with bipolar disorder: A qualitative focus group study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morton Emma, Kcomt Andrew, Michalak Erin E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peer support has a long history of being offered through community programs, and is increasingly formalized in mental health services to facilitate recovery-oriented care for mental health concerns such as bipolar disorder (BD). This qualitative study explored experiences of community-based peer support programs from the perspective of people with BD, to generate insights to optimise the delivery of peer support in clinical settings.
METHODS: Adults living in Canada with BD, who had participated in or provided peer support, participated in one of five 90-min focus groups. Participants were questioned about interacting with peers, helpful and unhelpful group aspects, and facilitators of positive outcomes. Thematic analysis was used to identify key aspects of peer support.
RESULTS: Sixteen individuals with BD (81% women) participated in qualitative focus groups. Four overarching themes were generated to describe the benefits, challenges, and conduct of peer support: 1) Someone who knows what it's like, 2) Learning from one another, 3) Challenging interpersonal dynamics, 4) A good facilitator makes a world of difference.
CONCLUSIONS: While findings may have been weighted towards the perspectives of individuals with positive experiences, they generate future research questions regarding peer support processes and outcomes that are as yet understudied in the BD literature. Including lived experience perspectives in the design of evaluation studies is therefore recommended to ensure patient-valued outcomes are included. Given the critical role of facilitation in safeguarding against challenging experiences, investment in co-designed training programs is called for, leveraging the expertise of community programs.
METHODS: Adults living in Canada with BD, who had participated in or provided peer support, participated in one of five 90-min focus groups. Participants were questioned about interacting with peers, helpful and unhelpful group aspects, and facilitators of positive outcomes. Thematic analysis was used to identify key aspects of peer support.
RESULTS: Sixteen individuals with BD (81% women) participated in qualitative focus groups. Four overarching themes were generated to describe the benefits, challenges, and conduct of peer support: 1) Someone who knows what it's like, 2) Learning from one another, 3) Challenging interpersonal dynamics, 4) A good facilitator makes a world of difference.
CONCLUSIONS: While findings may have been weighted towards the perspectives of individuals with positive experiences, they generate future research questions regarding peer support processes and outcomes that are as yet understudied in the BD literature. Including lived experience perspectives in the design of evaluation studies is therefore recommended to ensure patient-valued outcomes are included. Given the critical role of facilitation in safeguarding against challenging experiences, investment in co-designed training programs is called for, leveraging the expertise of community programs.