Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024
Validation of a Hand-Held Point-of-Care Device to Measure Breath Hydrogen and Its Utility in Detecting Response to Antibiotic Treatment.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barahona Guillermo, Mc Bride Barry, Moran Áine, Harrison Ricky, Villatoro Luisa, Burns Robert, Konings Bo, Bulat Robert, McKnight Megan, Treisman Glenn, Pasricha Pankaj J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Breath testing for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is typically performed using clinic-based equipment or single-use test kits.
AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a portable, point-of-care breath analysis device (AIRE®, FoodMarble) in patients suspected to have SIBO. A technical assessment including a comparison to existing mail-in kits was first performed. Then, postprandial breath hydrogen levels of patients before and after antibiotic treatment were gathered and compared to levels seen in a healthy cohort.
METHODS: For the comparison, 50 patients suspected of having SIBO were provided with an AIRE device and performed concurrent LHBTs at-home with a mail-in breath test kit. For the postprandial analysis, twenty-four patients with chronic GI symptoms measured their postprandial hydrogen for 7 days prior to antibiotic treatment and for 7 days after treatment. 10 healthy controls also measured their postprandial hydrogen for 7 days.
RESULTS: Substantial agreement was demonstrated between AIRE and the mail-in kits for the performance of lactulose hydrogen breath tests (κ = 0.8). Prior to treatment, patients had significantly greater daily postprandial hydrogen than healthy controls (p < 0.001). The mean postprandial hydrogen of patients reduced significantly after treatment (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring postprandial hydrogen shows potential as a means of differentiating patients with chronic GI symptoms from healthy controls and may be useful in monitoring patients before, during, and after treatment. Future studies could help determine if pre-treatment breath gas levels are predictive of response to antibiotic treatment.
AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a portable, point-of-care breath analysis device (AIRE®, FoodMarble) in patients suspected to have SIBO. A technical assessment including a comparison to existing mail-in kits was first performed. Then, postprandial breath hydrogen levels of patients before and after antibiotic treatment were gathered and compared to levels seen in a healthy cohort.
METHODS: For the comparison, 50 patients suspected of having SIBO were provided with an AIRE device and performed concurrent LHBTs at-home with a mail-in breath test kit. For the postprandial analysis, twenty-four patients with chronic GI symptoms measured their postprandial hydrogen for 7 days prior to antibiotic treatment and for 7 days after treatment. 10 healthy controls also measured their postprandial hydrogen for 7 days.
RESULTS: Substantial agreement was demonstrated between AIRE and the mail-in kits for the performance of lactulose hydrogen breath tests (κ = 0.8). Prior to treatment, patients had significantly greater daily postprandial hydrogen than healthy controls (p < 0.001). The mean postprandial hydrogen of patients reduced significantly after treatment (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring postprandial hydrogen shows potential as a means of differentiating patients with chronic GI symptoms from healthy controls and may be useful in monitoring patients before, during, and after treatment. Future studies could help determine if pre-treatment breath gas levels are predictive of response to antibiotic treatment.