DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.113065
Association of leptomeningeal collateral status with clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in large-core infarction.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The prognostic significance of leptomeningeal collateral status in patients with acute large-core infarction undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains incompletely defined. We aimed to evaluate its impact using the Careggi Collateral Score (CCS).
METHODS
This post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort included patients with acute anterior circulation large-core infarction (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score [ASPECTS] 0-5) treated with EVT. Leptomeningeal collaterals were assessed on digital subtraction angiography using the CCS and categorized as poor (0-2) or good (3-4). The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3) at 90 days.
RESULTS
Among 490 patients, 134 (27.3%) had good collateral status. Good collateral status was associated with higher rates of favorable functional outcome (63.4% vs 27.0%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.08; 95% CI, 1.94-4.88; P < 0.01) and reduced mortality (18.7% vs 50.6%; aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63; P < 0.01). Good collateral status also was linked to lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.0% vs 16.0%; aOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19-0.98; P = 0.04), but was not associated with successful reperfusion.
CONCLUSION
In this cohort of patients with acute large-core infarction undergoing EVT, good leptomeningeal collateral status was associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced mortality, and lower hemorrhage risk, and these associations did not differ significantly by reperfusion success.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.