Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
Cilostazol improves the prognosis after hepatectomy in rats with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugita Hiroaki, Nakanuma Shinichi, Munesue Seiichi, Ishikawa Tatsuya, Tokoro Tomokazu, Takei Ryohei, Okazaki Mitsuyoshi, Kato Kaichiro, Takada Satoshi, Makino Isamu, Ozaki Noriyuki, Yamamoto Yasuhiko, Yagi Shintaro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Safe radical hepatectomy is important for patients with colorectal liver metastases complicated by sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative administration of cilostazol (CZ), an oral selective phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, on hepatectomy in rat SOS model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rats were divided into NL (normal liver), SOS (monocrotaline [MCT]-treated), and SOS + CZ (MCT + CZ-treated) groups. MCT or CZ was administered orally, and a 30% partial hepatectomy was performed 48 h after MCT administration. Postoperative survival rates were evaluated (n = 9, for each). Other rats were sacrificed on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 and evaluated histologically, immunohistochemically, biochemically, and using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), focusing particularly on SOS findings, liver damage, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) injury.
RESULTS: The cumulative 10-day postoperative survival rate was significantly higher in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group (88.9% vs 33.3%, P = 0.001). Total SOS scores were significantly lower in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group on both POD 1 and 3. Serum biochemistry and immunohistochemistry showed that CZ reduced liver damage after hepatectomy. TEM revealed that LSECs were significantly preserved morphologically in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group on POD 1 (86.1 ± 8.2% vs 63.8 ± 9.3%, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative CZ administration reduced liver injury by protecting LSECs and improved the prognosis after hepatectomy in rats with SOS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rats were divided into NL (normal liver), SOS (monocrotaline [MCT]-treated), and SOS + CZ (MCT + CZ-treated) groups. MCT or CZ was administered orally, and a 30% partial hepatectomy was performed 48 h after MCT administration. Postoperative survival rates were evaluated (n = 9, for each). Other rats were sacrificed on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 and evaluated histologically, immunohistochemically, biochemically, and using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), focusing particularly on SOS findings, liver damage, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) injury.
RESULTS: The cumulative 10-day postoperative survival rate was significantly higher in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group (88.9% vs 33.3%, P = 0.001). Total SOS scores were significantly lower in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group on both POD 1 and 3. Serum biochemistry and immunohistochemistry showed that CZ reduced liver damage after hepatectomy. TEM revealed that LSECs were significantly preserved morphologically in the SOS + CZ group than in the SOS group on POD 1 (86.1 ± 8.2% vs 63.8 ± 9.3%, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative CZ administration reduced liver injury by protecting LSECs and improved the prognosis after hepatectomy in rats with SOS.