Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025
Impact of GTV-CTV margin and other predictors on radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients from DAHANCA group.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wordenskjold Stougaard Sarah, Zukauskaite Ruta, Röttger Richard, Laugaard Lorenzen Ebbe, Lukas Konrad Maximilian, Long Krogh Simon, Panduro Nielsen Camilla, Frieda Aviaya Sommer Jeanette, Johansen Jørgen, Grau Eriksen Jesper, Kjaer Lonkvist Camilla, Friborg Jeppe, Brink Carsten, Rønn Hansen Christian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This multicentre, retrospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients, focusing on the role of gross tumour volume (GTV) to high dose CTV (CTV1) margin size and dose-related factors. Unlike previous studies focused on peak or single time-point dysphagia, this study modelled symptom trajectories using repeated follow-up data for a more complete picture. Patient/material and methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 1,948 patients with pharyngeal or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at three Danish centres. Data included physician-rated dysphagia (grade 0-4), tumour and treatment characteristics, and AI-based segmentations of organs at risk (OARs). Predictors included GTV-CTV1 margin size, mean doses to the oral cavity and pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM), GTV volume, chemotherapy, tumour site, fractionation, nimorazole, sex, smoking status, baseline dysphagia, and age. A logistic ordinal mixed-effects model was fitted with patient ID as random effect. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Model performance was assessed using calibration plots and area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: After excluding incomplete cases, 1,685 patients (7,829 visits) were analysed. GTV-CTV1 margin size was not significantly associated with dysphagia, although larger margins correlated with higher OAR doses. Higher doses to the lower PCM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30 per 5 Gy) and oral cavity (OR = 1.32 per 5 Gy) increased risk. The model demonstrated good calibration and robust discrimination (AUC = 0.77-0.84).
INTERPRETATION: Radiation dose to the oral cavity and lower PCM were the strongest modifiable predictors of dysphagia risk. Margin size was not independently associated, possibly due to confounding by clinical judgement.
RESULTS: After excluding incomplete cases, 1,685 patients (7,829 visits) were analysed. GTV-CTV1 margin size was not significantly associated with dysphagia, although larger margins correlated with higher OAR doses. Higher doses to the lower PCM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30 per 5 Gy) and oral cavity (OR = 1.32 per 5 Gy) increased risk. The model demonstrated good calibration and robust discrimination (AUC = 0.77-0.84).
INTERPRETATION: Radiation dose to the oral cavity and lower PCM were the strongest modifiable predictors of dysphagia risk. Margin size was not independently associated, possibly due to confounding by clinical judgement.