The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2023
Critical role of the RpoE stress response pathway in polymyxin resistance of Escherichia coli.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeng Ximin, Hinenoya Atsushi, Guan Ziqiang, Xu Fuzhou, Lin Jun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Polymyxins, including colistin, are the drugs of last resort to treat MDR bacterial infections in humans. In-depth understanding of the molecular basis and regulation of polymyxin resistance would provide new therapeutic opportunities to combat increasing polymyxin resistance. Here we aimed to identify novel targets that are crucial for polymyxin resistance using Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), a unique colistin-resistant model strain.
METHODS: BL21(DE3) was subjected to random transposon mutagenesis for screening colistin-susceptible mutants. The insertion sites of desired mutants were mapped; the key genes of interest were also inactivated in different strains to examine functional conservation. Specific genes in the known PmrAB and PhoPQ regulatory network were inactivated to examine crosstalk among different pathways. Lipid A species and membrane phospholipids were analysed by normal phase LC/MS.
RESULTS: Among eight mutants with increased susceptibility to colistin, five mutants contained different mutations in three genes (rseP, degS and surA) that belong to the RpoE stress response pathway. Inactivation of rpoE, pmrB, eptA or pmrD led to significantly increased susceptibility to colistin; however, inactivation of phoQ or eptB did not change colistin MIC. RpoE mutation in different E. coli and Salmonella resistant strains all led to significant reduction in colistin MIC (16-32-fold). Inactivation of rpoE did not change the lipid A profile but significantly altered the phospholipid profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the important members of the RpoE regulon in polymyxin-resistant strains led to a drastic reduction in polymyxin MIC and an increase of lysophospholipids with no change in lipid A modifications.
METHODS: BL21(DE3) was subjected to random transposon mutagenesis for screening colistin-susceptible mutants. The insertion sites of desired mutants were mapped; the key genes of interest were also inactivated in different strains to examine functional conservation. Specific genes in the known PmrAB and PhoPQ regulatory network were inactivated to examine crosstalk among different pathways. Lipid A species and membrane phospholipids were analysed by normal phase LC/MS.
RESULTS: Among eight mutants with increased susceptibility to colistin, five mutants contained different mutations in three genes (rseP, degS and surA) that belong to the RpoE stress response pathway. Inactivation of rpoE, pmrB, eptA or pmrD led to significantly increased susceptibility to colistin; however, inactivation of phoQ or eptB did not change colistin MIC. RpoE mutation in different E. coli and Salmonella resistant strains all led to significant reduction in colistin MIC (16-32-fold). Inactivation of rpoE did not change the lipid A profile but significantly altered the phospholipid profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the important members of the RpoE regulon in polymyxin-resistant strains led to a drastic reduction in polymyxin MIC and an increase of lysophospholipids with no change in lipid A modifications.