Pilocarpine 1.25% efficacy for management of uncorrected presbyopia (PILE-UP study).
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pilocarpine 1.25% eye drops for improving near vision acuity in presbyopic individuals.
DESIGN
Prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial.
METHODS
This single-arm prospective interventional trial includes 50 presbyopic individuals aged between 40 to 55, administered pilocarpine 1.25% eye drops daily once (9 am, Hour 0) for one month. Visual parameters, including distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), near add power, amplitude of accommodation (AoA), and depth of focus (DoF) along with ocular biometric parameters, were assessed at baseline and after one month at hour 3 (12 noon) and hour 6 (3 pm). Adverse effects were monitored.
RESULTS
After one month of pilocarpine treatment, a significant improvement was observed in DCNVA (0.64 ± 0.2 to 0.26 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) along with a decrease in near add power (1.43 ± 0.43 D to 0.42 ± 0.22 D, P < 0.001). The AoA increased (3.23 ± 0.74 D to 3.92 ± 0.93 D, P: 0.005), and DoF widened (0.72 ± 0.18 D to 0.81 ± 0.26 D, P: 0.038). No change in ocular biometry parameters was observed. The change in DCNVA showed strong positive correlations with change in near add (r: 0.84, P: <0.001) and AoA (r: 0.66, P: 0.04). Adverse effects were mild and did not lead to discontinuation.
CONCLUSION
Pilocarpine 1.25% eye drops demonstrated statistically significant improvements in DCNVA, near add, AoA, and DoF after one month of treatment. Pilocarpine 1.25% eye drops shown increase in the AoA and DoF; without any significant change in ocular biometry parameters. The use of pilocarpine 1.25% eye drops can be an alternative intervention for enhancing near vision acuity of presbyopic subjects.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.