MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1309/qjebxp0bcgr54l15

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of clinical pathology · 2007

Invasive Streptomyces infections: six cases and literature review.

Kapadia Mona, Rolston Kenneth V I, Han Xiang Y

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Streptomyces are saprophytic soil organisms rarely known to cause invasive infections other than mycetoma. We report 6 cases of invasive Streptomyces infections and review 13 previously reported cases. Our series included 2 cases of lung abscess or pneumonitis, 3 cases of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection, and I case of possible hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Most previous cases also included lung infections and bloodstream infections. Preexisting conditions, such as cancer, AIDS or HIV infection, presence of a central venous catheter, and prosthetic heart valve, were present in all cases since 1985. Diverse Streptomyces species were involved, consistent with the highly opportunistic nature of the infections. Clinical management depended on the clinical situation of individual cases without consensus. Available susceptibility data showed that Streptomyces organisms were consistently susceptible to amikacin; frequently susceptible to imipenem, clarithromycin or erythromycin, minocycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; and infrequently susceptible to ciprofloxacin and ampicillin. The diagnosis of Streptomyces infection required microbiologic and pathologic correlation to rule out contamination.

Для цитирования: Kapadia Mona, Rolston Kenneth V I, Han Xiang Y. Invasive Streptomyces infections: six cases and literature review.. American journal of clinical pathology. 2007. DOI: 10.1309/qjebxp0bcgr54l15.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.