MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wox.0b013e3181b2ff8a

Медицинская библиотека · The World Allergy Organization journal · 2009

Consensus Description of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Studies of Nonallergic Rhinopathy (NAR), Previously Referred to as Vasomotor Rhinitis (VMR), Nonallergic Rhinitis, and/or Idiopathic Rhinitis.

Kaliner Michael A, Baraniuk James N, Benninger Michael S, Bernstein Jonathan A, Lieberman Phil, Meltzer Eli O, Naclerio Robert M, Settipane Russell A, Farrar Judith R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

"Nonallergic rhinopathy" was defined by consensus at a Roundtable conference in December 2008 as "a chronic nasal condition with symptoms that may be perennial, persistent, intermittent or seasonal and/or elicited by recognized triggers." The definition includes a well-recognized set of clinical exposures that lead to the symptoms, predominantly congestion, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip. These clinical characteristics help to identify patients for participation in clinical trials examining the efficacy of treatments for this important disease. The next step is to establish inclusion and exclusion criteria that will provide a framework for the clinical trials. Agreement on study criteria was obtained at the consensus conference by discussion, counterpoint, and compromise.

Для цитирования: Kaliner Michael A, Baraniuk James N, Benninger Michael S, Bernstein Jonathan A, Lieberman Phil, Meltzer Eli O, Naclerio Robert M, Settipane Russell A, Farrar Judith R. Consensus Description of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Studies of Nonallergic Rhinopathy (NAR), Previously Referred to as Vasomotor Rhinitis (VMR), Nonallergic Rhinitis, and/or Idiopathic Rhinitis.. The World Allergy Organization journal. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/wox.0b013e3181b2ff8a.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.