MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101852

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025

Innovative left internal carotid stenting via right brachial access in a high-risk patient.

Balamane Saad, Babrowski Trissa

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Carotid artery stenosis in patients with complex comorbidities, severe calcification, and prior surgical interventions presents significant procedural challenges. Traditional access routes for stenting, such as transfemoral or transcarotid, may be unfeasible in such cases, requiring innovative alternatives. A 79-year-old man with symptomatic high-grade left internal carotid artery stenosis, severe aortoiliac occlusive disease, and a history of failed transfemoral stenting was treated successfully with left internal carotid artery stenting via right brachial artery access. The patient's complex vascular anatomy, including a bovine arch, calcified carotid bifurcation, and postradiation fibrosis, made conventional approaches impractical. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy and embolic protection device were used to modify calcified plaque and prevent embolization. This case demonstrates that right brachial artery access provides a viable and innovative solution for carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with challenging vascular anatomy. When traditional access routes are contraindicated, this approach expands treatment options, offering a safe and effective alternative for complex carotid interventions.

Для цитирования: Balamane Saad, Babrowski Trissa. Innovative left internal carotid stenting via right brachial access in a high-risk patient.. Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101852.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.