Sample-to-answer direct real-time PCR detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia spp., and Babesia spp. infections in whole-blood specimens.

UNLABELLED: Emerging tick-borne illnesses, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, or ehrlichiosis, are caused by obligate intracellular pathogens that have clinically comparable presentations. Diagnostics used in laboratories today are serologic assays and blood smear analyses, which have known diagnostic limits. This study evaluated the performance of a sample-to-answer direct real-time PCR laboratory-developed test for the multiplex qualitative detection of Anaplasma, Babesia, and Ehrlichia DNA in whole-blood specimens. Compared to two standard-of-care (SOC) methods, the DiaSorin tick-borne laboratory-developed test for Anaplasma detection demonstrated a positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 100% (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.0) and 89% (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97), respectively with a discordant rate of 9.3% against microscopy. After discordant resolution, the NPA increased to 100%. For Babesia, the test demonstrated a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Compared to a SOC PCR method Anaplasma samples showed a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Ehrlichia results showed a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). The total percent agreement was 98% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.99) with a κ statistic of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99) or almost perfect agreement compared to SOC methods. This laboratory-developed test for detecting Anaplasma, Babesia, and Ehrlichia DNA provides rapid and reliable detection of tick-borne infections without nucleic acid extraction.

IMPORTANCE

This work demonstrates that detection of tick-borne illnesses, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, or ehrlichiosis, can be performed directly from whole blood with no extraction. The assay described here has a high positive and negative percent agreement with existing methods and is used as the standard of care. An increasing incidence of tick-borne illness combined with shortage of well-trained technologists to perform traditional manual testing, testing options that can be adapted to various lab settings, are of the utmost importance.