DOI 10.3390/diagnostics15151869
Prevention Works Best in Pairs: An Observational Study on Connubial Melanoma.
Аннотация
Background
Connubial melanoma, the occurrence of melanoma in non-consanguineous spouses, is rarely described in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of shared risk factors, preventive behaviors, and the influence of couple dynamics on the early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma (CM).
Methods
We conducted a retrospective observational study at the San Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, enrolling 52 heterosexual couples diagnosed with CM between 2010 and 2023. Clinical and anamnestic data, including phototype, history of sun exposure, use of tanning devices, and reason for dermatological evaluation, were collected. Dermatological assessments included dermoscopy, total body photography, and histological examination of excised lesions. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square and Student's t-tests.
Results
Women reported significantly higher use of artificial ultraviolet sources (51.9% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.001) and more frequent histories of sunburn. Phototype II was associated with higher use of tanning devices and a greater prevalence of sunburns. Although the CM stage did not significantly differ between sexes, husbands exhibited a greater Breslow thickness. Melanoma localization differed by sex, with lower limbs more often affected in women and the trunk in men (p < 0.001). In 86.5% of cases, wives initiated their husband's dermatological evaluation, leading to earlier diagnosis.
Conclusions
Despite shared environmental exposures, men and women differ in preventive behaviors and risk profiles. Women play a crucial role in promoting early detection among couples. Couple-based preventive strategies may be instrumental in improving early melanoma diagnosis and outcomes.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.