Journal of microbiological methods · 2022
Evaluation of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the BD Max™ Enteric Bacterial Panel for molecular detection of pathogens for acute gastroenteritis in the Singaporean population.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koo Seok Hwee, Heng Ying Xuan, Jiang Boran, Ng Lily Siew Yong, Sim Diana Miao Fang, Tan Thean Yen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is caused by a wide range of pathogens. Culture methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens is time consuming and labour intensive. This study compared a same-day-to-result commercial molecular method using BD Max™ Enteric Bacterial Panel against conventional culture and laboratory-developed PCR assays (LDTs), and characterised the epidemiology of bacterial AGE in Singapore.
METHODOLOGY: PCRs for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)/Shigella dysenteriae were performed on the BD Max™ platform. Concurrent routine bacterial culture ("reference standard") was performed for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio and Aeromonas spp. In the event of a discrepancy, an "expanded reference standard" (bacterial culture with LDT) was used.
RESULTS: There were 299 stool specimens in the study, with no bacterial pathogens detected in 190 samples (63.5%). The positive samples (n = 109,36.5%) were detected with Salmonella (n = 57,19.1%), Campylobacter (n = 28,9.4%), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (n = 6,2.0%), Shigella/EIEC (n = 6,2.0%), ETEC (n = 4,1.3%), STEC (n = 2,0.7%), Aeromonas (n = 2,0.7%), Plesiomonas shigelloides (n = 1,0.3%) and 3(1.0%) co-infections. Compared to the "expanded reference standard", conventional culture missed 38/112 (33.9%) pathogens. Conversely, testing by BD Max™ alone failed to detect 17 pathogens. BD Max™ reported seven (2.3%) false-positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: BD Max™ increased the detection rate of bacterial AGE pathogens in the panel, but was limited by the absence of detection capability for Vibrio and Aeromonas spp.
METHODOLOGY: PCRs for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)/Shigella dysenteriae were performed on the BD Max™ platform. Concurrent routine bacterial culture ("reference standard") was performed for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio and Aeromonas spp. In the event of a discrepancy, an "expanded reference standard" (bacterial culture with LDT) was used.
RESULTS: There were 299 stool specimens in the study, with no bacterial pathogens detected in 190 samples (63.5%). The positive samples (n = 109,36.5%) were detected with Salmonella (n = 57,19.1%), Campylobacter (n = 28,9.4%), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (n = 6,2.0%), Shigella/EIEC (n = 6,2.0%), ETEC (n = 4,1.3%), STEC (n = 2,0.7%), Aeromonas (n = 2,0.7%), Plesiomonas shigelloides (n = 1,0.3%) and 3(1.0%) co-infections. Compared to the "expanded reference standard", conventional culture missed 38/112 (33.9%) pathogens. Conversely, testing by BD Max™ alone failed to detect 17 pathogens. BD Max™ reported seven (2.3%) false-positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: BD Max™ increased the detection rate of bacterial AGE pathogens in the panel, but was limited by the absence of detection capability for Vibrio and Aeromonas spp.