MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.001

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of surgical research · 2025

Perspectives on Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 on Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Baskin Alison S, Stover Michael P, Bains Manvir, Montgomery Kelsey B, Oslock Wendelyn M, Broman Kristy K, Dossett Lesly A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In 2021, the Commission on Cancer implemented Standard 5.8, which requires that lymph nodes be sampled from ≥1 hilar and ≥3 different mediastinal lymph node stations for all curative-intent lung cancer resections. While 80% compliance is expected of all Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals, recent data illustrates only half of sites are currently meeting criteria. We evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators in implementing Standard 5.8.

METHODS

In this multicenter qualitative study, 20 semistructured interviews were conducted across academic and community-based institutions. We interviewed key stakeholders, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, operating room staff, a cancer liaison physician, and clinical data analysts. Thematic analysis was facilitated by the tailored implementation for chronic disease checklist.

RESULTS

Themes were mapped to six tailored implementation for chronic disease domains. Most participants felt the guideline was not burdensome and did not alter their clinical practices. Although many agreed that a minimum threshold for lymph node evaluation should exist, some participants were uncertain of the supporting evidence and identified potential technical and clinical barriers to implementation. Interdisciplinary collaboration was a key facilitator to compliance, as well as alignment with professional society guidelines. Higher compliance rates were thought to be driven by increased monitoring and performance feedback, in addition to departmental leadership and support.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed opinions regarding Standard 5.8 align with currently low national compliance rates. Participants emphasized the need for additional evidence to support the standard, underscoring the importance of future prospective studies. Support for strong interdisciplinary communication, regularly scheduled feedback, endorsement by cardiothoracic societies and departmental leadership may improve compliance.

Для цитирования: Baskin Alison S, Stover Michael P, Bains Manvir, Montgomery Kelsey B, Oslock Wendelyn M, Broman Kristy K, Dossett Lesly A. Perspectives on Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 on Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study.. The Journal of surgical research. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.