Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022
Race and ethnicity define disparate clinical outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Konsur Evelyn, Rigg Lauren, Moore Donyea, Patel Malina, Batra Pete S, Mahdavinia Mahboobeh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common upper airways inflammatory disease requiring multidisciplinary care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if African Americans (AA), Latinxs, and nonLatinx White (White) patients have different chronic rhinosinusitis outcomes and to identify associated factors impacting these outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a large prospective cohort study of CRS patients who were evaluated and followed for several clinical variables at the initial encounter and after continuous management of CRS for a mean of 40 months. The Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Lund-MacKay scores were measured on initial visits, and SNOT-22 was repeated at the end of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between the different groups adjusted for comorbidities and demographics.
RESULTS: Among the 977 enrolled CRS cases, 615 (63.0%), 235 (24.1%) and 138 (13.0%) were White, AA and Latinx respectively. There was no difference in severity of CRS based on Lund-MacKay scores and SNOT-22 scores, and frequency of other comorbidities at presentation among the 3 groups. During the follow-up period, compared with Whites, AA and Latinx were less frequently evaluated by an allergist. AAs had less frequent CRS related visits and lower final SNOT-22 score compared with Whites.
CONCLUSION: Although our enrolled patients from the 3 ethnic groups had similar clinical characteristics and disease burden at baseline, AAs had less frequent follow-up visits and worse final SNOT-22 after 40 months of follow-up. The observed poorer outcomes in AAs are likely owing to inequity in healthcare access evidenced by differences in insurance and suboptimal management of CRS.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if African Americans (AA), Latinxs, and nonLatinx White (White) patients have different chronic rhinosinusitis outcomes and to identify associated factors impacting these outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a large prospective cohort study of CRS patients who were evaluated and followed for several clinical variables at the initial encounter and after continuous management of CRS for a mean of 40 months. The Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Lund-MacKay scores were measured on initial visits, and SNOT-22 was repeated at the end of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between the different groups adjusted for comorbidities and demographics.
RESULTS: Among the 977 enrolled CRS cases, 615 (63.0%), 235 (24.1%) and 138 (13.0%) were White, AA and Latinx respectively. There was no difference in severity of CRS based on Lund-MacKay scores and SNOT-22 scores, and frequency of other comorbidities at presentation among the 3 groups. During the follow-up period, compared with Whites, AA and Latinx were less frequently evaluated by an allergist. AAs had less frequent CRS related visits and lower final SNOT-22 score compared with Whites.
CONCLUSION: Although our enrolled patients from the 3 ethnic groups had similar clinical characteristics and disease burden at baseline, AAs had less frequent follow-up visits and worse final SNOT-22 after 40 months of follow-up. The observed poorer outcomes in AAs are likely owing to inequity in healthcare access evidenced by differences in insurance and suboptimal management of CRS.