The patient · 2025
Co-designing Healthcare Interventions with Users: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Young People's Preferences for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Lusaka, Zambia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mwenge Lawrence, Quaife Matthew, Sigande Lucheka, Floyd Sian, Simuyaba Melvin, Phiri Mwelwa, Mwansa Chisanga, Kabumbu Mutale, Simwinga Musonda, Shanaube Kwame, Schaap Ab, Fidler Sarah, Hayes Richard, Ayles Helen, Hensen Bernadette, Hangoma Peter
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Like in many countries, coverage of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 remains low in Zambia. Increasing coverage of SRH services requires interventions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of AYP. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit AYP's preferences for SRH service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.
RESULTS: A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the "neither" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.
METHODS: A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.
RESULTS: A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the "neither" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.