MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7547/24-046

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association · 2025

Evidencing Superior Efficacy.

Kazez Muhammed, Yalin Mustafa, Ayas Orhan, Esmez Ömer, Key Sefa

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the rates of recurrence, complications, and patient satisfaction among individuals undergoing different variations of the Winograd method (WM) for the treatment of ingrown toenail, including the addition of electrocoagulation (EC) and a novel suture technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 605 patients who underwent surgery for ingrown toenail using the WM at two institutions. Patients were divided into four groups based on the surgical technique used: group 1 (WM + EC + new suture), group 2 (WM + EC + traditional suture), group 3 (WM + non-EC + traditional suture), and group 4 (WM + non-EC + new suture). Recurrence rates, complications, and patient satisfaction levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Group 1 demonstrated the lowest recurrence rates, whereas group 3 had the highest. Group 1 exhibited the highest satisfaction rate, whereas group 3 had the lowest. Notably, the suture technique appeared to have a greater impact on reducing recurrence rates than EC.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating germinal matrixectomy with EC and a new suture method with the WM may improve patient satisfaction and reduce recurrence rates in ingrown toenail treatment. The suture technique appears to play a significant role in decreasing recurrence rates compared with EC.

Для цитирования: Kazez Muhammed, Yalin Mustafa, Ayas Orhan, Esmez Ömer, Key Sefa. Evidencing Superior Efficacy.. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2025. DOI: 10.7547/24-046.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.