DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2026.04.020
Oral dapsone in refractory rosacea: A prospective exploratory study defining a "high inflammatory burden" subtype and a testable precision treatment hypothesis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Refractory rosacea lacks evidence-based management.
OBJECTIVE
To preliminarily assess oral dapsone outcomes in strictly defined refractory rosacea, explore mechanisms via proteomics, and generate a testable subtyping hypothesis.
METHODS
This prospective, single-center, single-arm exploratory trial enrolled 124 refractory rosacea patients. Patients received dapsone 100 mg daily for 8 weeks. A nested substudy (N = 28) collected stratum corneum for proteomics. Using proteomic and clinical data, we defined a "high inflammatory burden" subtype and explored its association with treatment response.
RESULTS
Patients failed a mean of 3.2 prior treatments. At week 8, 59.68% achieved Investigator Global Assessment 0/1. 82.26% achieved "deep remission" (both Investigator Global Assessment and Clinician Erythema Assessment improved)-a finding requiring interpretation within potential placebo effects (20% to 45%). Proteomics revealed 33 downregulated inflammation-related proteins. The "high inflammatory burden" subtype (54.03%) showed higher deep remission (88.06% vs 75.44%), absolute difference 12.62% (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.925-6.23; P = .110), not reaching significance.
LIMITATIONS: Single-center, single-arm design.
CONCLUSION
This exploratory study observed clinical improvements with oral dapsone in refractory rosacea and generated a testable hypothesis: the "high inflammatory burden" subtype may identify patients more likely to benefit. Providing a clear subtype definition, effect size estimates, and enrichment trial design, this study offers an actionable framework for future validation trials.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.