Muscle & nerve · 2014
Intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment in myasthenia gravis: a randomized, controlled trial sample size simulation.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eienbröker Christian, Seitz Florian, Spengler Anna, Kurz Heike, Seipelt Maria, Sommer Norbert, Oertel Wolfgang H, Timmesfeld Nina, Tackenberg Björn
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In cases of exacerbation or crisis, myasthenia gravis (MG) patients can be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasmapheresis, or immunoadsorption. However, IVIg efficacy data in maintenance treatment are sparse.
METHODS: We prospectively observed 16 index patients with chronic and insufficiently controlled MG under standard immunosuppressant therapy and symptomatic treatment. The IVIg treatment response was measured using changes in quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score and surrogates. Based on these results, a sample size calculation for a future randomized, controlled trial (RCT) was simulated.
RESULTS: There was an enduring decline in QMG score and other parameters of about 50% under IVIg maintenance treatment. RCT sample size calculation results in 73 or 33 patients per arm to detect at least a 20% vs. 30% clinical difference in QMG score.
CONCLUSION: We recommend using the QMG score as a primary endpoint for an RCT of IVIg maintenance for chronic MG.
METHODS: We prospectively observed 16 index patients with chronic and insufficiently controlled MG under standard immunosuppressant therapy and symptomatic treatment. The IVIg treatment response was measured using changes in quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score and surrogates. Based on these results, a sample size calculation for a future randomized, controlled trial (RCT) was simulated.
RESULTS: There was an enduring decline in QMG score and other parameters of about 50% under IVIg maintenance treatment. RCT sample size calculation results in 73 or 33 patients per arm to detect at least a 20% vs. 30% clinical difference in QMG score.
CONCLUSION: We recommend using the QMG score as a primary endpoint for an RCT of IVIg maintenance for chronic MG.