Minerva anestesiologica · 2026
Intraoperative hemodynamic patterns during hypotension prediction index-guided care: a high-resolution secondary analysis of the HYT trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ripollés-Melchor Javier, Espinosa Ángel V, Aldecoa César, Quintana-Villamandos Begoña, Colomina María J, Navarro-Pérez Rosalía, Fernández-López Ignacio, Abad-Gurumeta Alfredo, Lorente Juan V, Abad-Motos Ane, Carrasco-Sánchez Laura, Rivas Eva, Fernández-Valdes-Bango Paula, Budithi Rachel, Zorrilla-Vaca Andrés, Monge-García M Ignacio, HYT Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) reduces intraoperative hypotension, improvements in patient-centered outcomes remain inconsistent. We performed a high-resolution signal analysis to describe the coexistence of arterial pressure, preload-related hemodynamic signals, and algorithm-derived hypotension risk during surgery.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective high-resolution signal analysis (20-second intervals) of 181 patients from the multicenter HYT trial. We quantified hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] <65 mmHg), preload-dependent physiology (stroke volume variation [SVV] >13%), and their temporal relationship with HPI-derived risk signals. Patients were classified into four descriptive groups based on combinations of MAP and SVV burden.
RESULTS: Overall hypotension exposure was low (median 1.3% of monitored time), whereas preload-dependent physiology was more frequent (approximately 10%) and often persisted during periods classified as low hypotension risk (HPI <80). SVV >13% preceded hypotensive events significantly earlier than HPI alerts (median 8.7 vs. 1.8 minutes; P=0.0119). Higher vasopressor burden was observed in patients with preserved MAP despite sustained SVV elevation.
CONCLUSIONS: During HPI-guided care, preserved arterial pressure frequently coexists with sustained preload-dependent hemodynamic signals. These findings describe patterns of pressure and preload-related signal behavior during algorithm-guided hemodynamic management and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective high-resolution signal analysis (20-second intervals) of 181 patients from the multicenter HYT trial. We quantified hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] <65 mmHg), preload-dependent physiology (stroke volume variation [SVV] >13%), and their temporal relationship with HPI-derived risk signals. Patients were classified into four descriptive groups based on combinations of MAP and SVV burden.
RESULTS: Overall hypotension exposure was low (median 1.3% of monitored time), whereas preload-dependent physiology was more frequent (approximately 10%) and often persisted during periods classified as low hypotension risk (HPI <80). SVV >13% preceded hypotensive events significantly earlier than HPI alerts (median 8.7 vs. 1.8 minutes; P=0.0119). Higher vasopressor burden was observed in patients with preserved MAP despite sustained SVV elevation.
CONCLUSIONS: During HPI-guided care, preserved arterial pressure frequently coexists with sustained preload-dependent hemodynamic signals. These findings describe patterns of pressure and preload-related signal behavior during algorithm-guided hemodynamic management and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.