MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/esj/aakaf013

Медицинская библиотека · European stroke journal · 2026

FRET score: predictors of futile recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy-a multicentre cohort study from the EVATRISP collaboration.

Schwartzmann Yoel, Heldner Mirjam R, Jubran Hamza, Arnold Marcel, Breiding Philipe S, Shalabi Fatma, Jubeh Tamer, Metanis Issa, Nordanstig Annika, Nederkoorn Paul J, Wali Nabila, van der Meij Anne, Wegener Susanne, Otto Lukas, Handelsmann Hannah Lea, Michel Patrik, Strambo Davide, Salerno Alexander, De Marchis Gian Marco, Dittrich Tolga, Curtze Sami, Martinez-Majander Nicolas, Gensicke Henrik, Engelter Stefan, Altersberger Valerian, Trüssel Simon, Nolte Christian H, Riegler Christoph, Zini Andrea, Naldi Federica, Bigliardi Guido, Picchetto Livio, Marto Joao Pedro, Costa José Pedro, Molad Jeremy, Hallevi Hen, Cereda Carlo W, Pezzini Alessandro, Magoni Mauro, Padjen Visnja, Zedde Marialuisa, Leker Ronen R

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the treatment of choice for LVO stroke, yet nearly half of successfully recanalised patients fail to achieve functional independence, a phenomenon termed futile recanalisation (FR). Predictors of FR remain poorly defined in large, heterogeneous populations. Therefore, we aimed to develop a predictive score for FR.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Endovascular thrombectomy-treated LVO patients from the prospective, multicentre EVATRISP collaboration were included. All patients had known pre-stroke functional status, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score and 90-day mRS. Futile recanalisation was defined as mRS > 2 at 90 days despite mTICI ≥ 2b. Patients with FR were compared to those with successful recanalisation and mRS ≤ 2. The cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors that were used to construct the futile recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy (FRET) score.

RESULTS

Of 9909 patients, 7272 (73%) achieved successful recanalisation and 3420 (47%) of them experienced FR. In the derivation set, FR was independently associated with older age, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, higher NIHSS, anterior cerebral artery occlusion, seizures at presentation, non-use of intravenous thrombolysis and lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or posterior circulation ASPECTS. Futile recanalisation patients had longer hospital stays and higher mortality rates. The FRET score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.721; 95% CI, 0.702-0.740), with FRET ≥ 3 indicating high risk. The validation cohort yielded similar performance (AUC 0.708; 95% CI, 0.680-0.737).

CONCLUSION

The FRET score enables early identification of EVT patients at high risk for FR.

Для цитирования: Schwartzmann Yoel, Heldner Mirjam R, Jubran Hamza, Arnold Marcel, Breiding Philipe S, Shalabi Fatma, Jubeh Tamer, Metanis Issa, Nordanstig Annika, Nederkoorn Paul J, Wali Nabila, van der Meij Anne, Wegener Susanne, Otto Lukas, Handelsmann Hannah Lea, Michel Patrik, Strambo Davide, Salerno Alexander, De Marchis Gian Marco, Dittrich Tolga, Curtze Sami, Martinez-Majander Nicolas, Gensicke Henrik, Engelter Stefan, Altersberger Valerian, Trüssel Simon, Nolte Christian H, Riegler Christoph, Zini Andrea, Naldi Federica, Bigliardi Guido, Picchetto Livio, Marto Joao Pedro, Costa José Pedro, Molad Jeremy, Hallevi Hen, Cereda Carlo W, Pezzini Alessandro, Magoni Mauro, Padjen Visnja, Zedde Marialuisa, Leker Ronen R. FRET score: predictors of futile recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy-a multicentre cohort study from the EVATRISP collaboration.. European stroke journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/esj/aakaf013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.