Navigating Unanticipated Non-recurrent Laryngeal Nerves in Thyroid Surgery: Strategies for Preservation and Anticipation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the incidence, anatomical characteristics, and clinical implications of non-recurrent laryngeal nerves (NRLNs) discovered during thyroid surgeries and autopsies.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
A total of 2,215 thyroid surgeries and 194 autopsies were reviewed, identifying 17 and 1 case of NRLN, respectively. Data regarding nerve anatomy, associated vascular anomalies, and patient medical history were collected and analyzed. Neck ultrasound examinations were subsequently performed on the 17 living patients, 5 months to 19 years post-surgery, by three radiologists specializing in head and neck soft-tissue imaging. Two radiologists were blinded to the specific nerve anatomy, while one was unblinded.
RESULTS
Vascular anomalies of the aortic arch were described only by the unblinded radiologist. Among the 17 NRLN cases, three (16.7%) exhibited normal vascular anatomy. According to Toniato et al.'s classification, one case each was categorized as 2a, 2b, and one case involved a coexisting right NRLN and right RLN. No definitive recurrent paresis was observed, with only one patient experiencing transient palsy lasting 5 weeks. Histological evaluation revealed no structural differences between NRLN and RLN variants, although their epineurium and adventitia were notably thinner than those of the vagal nerve.
CONCLUSION
Achieving blood-free conditions for meticulous dissection and preserving sympathetic nerve branches are essential for optimal functional outcomes in thyroid surgeries involving NRLNs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.